As Poecile says -"Straight conservation (eg wardenning) is badly paid and hard graft. The better-paid jobs are in consultancy and research, eg with universities, Natural England, SNH, CCW and private sector consultancies that undertake eg Phase 1 & 2 habitat surveys. Naturally there is a boom in consultancy work due to the building boom in the SE (which has no end in sight), as most projects need an environmental impact assessment and ecological survey. Also public sector organisations like British Antarctic Survey, CEFAS, CEH and EA have research jobs, and they tend to be top of the bracket for pay. BUT, getting a decent job just through identifying things is a myth. While field skills are a valuable commodity, fieldworkers are also often ten-a-penny. What REALLY makes someone an attractive candidate is having technical and analytical skills too - especially stats, modelling, spatial analysis. You need as many strings to your bow as possible, to make yourself as flexible as possible."
This was advertised on the Orientalbirding Yahoo Group - "Hi All
A reputable conservation NGO has asked me to help them
find highly competent ornithologists/birders that are available at
short notice for autumn survey work in northern Afghanistan.
You
will have to commit for between 5 and 8 weeks from early September
onwards. You will have to be able to handle rough conditions at high
altitude and design a sensible survey (taking conservation
considerations into account) and report competently and clearly on it.
The NGO will pay a decent salary and provide logistical support
(translator, donkeys etc.)
I'm told the security situation in the area is good."
You would have to sign-up to the group to get the full details but I think it demonstrates Poecile's point quite well. eg, survey design and reporting are skills in their own right (that's aside from the challenge of working in pretty extreme conditions!!!) BUT, sounds like a fantastic opportunity to be able to really contribute something worthwhile.
cheers
Gordon