I speak as one mystified by the ID of Forster's tern in other than a) classic non-breeding plumage or b) hi-res photos showing the spread primaries, but, seeing as there's no classic non-breeders here... can I ask which of the four small terns at the front are you saying is/are Forster's and why?...there are royal, sandwhich, forster's, and common terns.
can I ask which of the four small terns at the front are you saying is/are Forster's and why?
Looks OK for common tern - which means it also looks OK (to me) for Forster's.I didn't know what else the one preening on the left foreground with the black-tipped orange bill (though it does seem a bit too heavy) and orangish legs could be
1st photo, far right, 3rd bird from the bottom: is that not a Gull-Billed Tern?
I don't think I see a pale tip, cos the tip is buried in feathers, preening. Probably Sandwich (bill is pretty slender). Ditto (quite likely) the two others to its right ( = our left).Think the bird suggested as a possible GBT is a Sandwich--bill looks slender and I think I see a pale tip.
I don't think I see a pale tip, cos the tip is buried in feathers, preening. Probably Sandwich (bill is pretty slender). Ditto (quite likely) the two others to its right ( = our left).
Could you say why the 1-year-olds are Forster's?-5 forster's including the 3 2cy to the right of the preening adult in foreground
I have to say I'm surprised you're hanging it on that alone - in an image of this small size, and when proportions are foreshortened by the angle of view (and I wouldn't say they look stronger-billed than common anyway). Isn't there a lot of black on the head for 1-year-old Forster's?because of the strong bills - slightly slimmer in common.