• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Common greenshank with with a broken beak? (1 Viewer)

Michał Jaro

Well-known member
Hi what do you think - is it Common greenshank with a broken beak?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0861.JPG
    IMG_0861.JPG
    130.9 KB · Views: 153
  • IMG_0862.JPG
    IMG_0862.JPG
    109.1 KB · Views: 152
  • IMG_0863.JPG
    IMG_0863.JPG
    89 KB · Views: 152
Hello,
do you have more pictures? At first I agreed with Butty, that tail might well be missing.
But I think now, that tail might well be "lost" in picture quality. Greenshank has a quite whitish tail (with barring doesnt distract much from this). And it surely helps, that I am on a good screen.
I struggled hard to make this bird into a Wood Sandpiper (is the white back real or an artefact ...), but I failed.
Do you have seen this short bill in the field, too? At fist I thought, proportions were slightly off for a Greenshank with a too small head (and to broad wings), but now I think, the bird is turning its head towards you.

So I think, this is indeed a Greenshank with an abnormal short bill. Or is there a vagrant that looks like this bird?
Hope to be wrong here!
 
I don't think it is missing either beak or tail. The head seems turned towards camera foreshortening the bill and the white of the rump is hard to make out against the pale grey sky background.

EDIT: Alexander has posted while I was typing up the above with the similar conclusions.
 
Thanks for helping !
But white rump is white rump (and top) is not artifact (see below)
And beak .. there are three photos (three other positions) with the same lenght of it. Ive saw gulls with that turned head ... but sandpipers? and still too short
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0862.1.JPG
    IMG_0862.1.JPG
    91.2 KB · Views: 38
Spotted redshank ? let's take a look at the range of white on the top and rump, the beak should be even longer .... impossible in my opinion, but thanks for your point (y)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0861.1.JPG
    IMG_0861.1.JPG
    121.6 KB · Views: 29
Hello,
thanks to Stonefaction, Butty and Pianoman from me, too! As said, Greenshank doesnt seem a 100% perfect match still today, but still a better fit than other (european) waders.
But yes, thanks Butty for reminding me not to squeeze to much out of such pictures (do I still have to write that this isnt meant as offence, as you know Michal). Bird isnt IDable for me with confidence, but maybe others can? I hope for more comments!
 
Could Marsh Sandpiper be a possibility? Could explain the small head 'feel' and potentially also the thin looking bill. Not in any way suggesting the photo is identifiable as a Marsh Sandpiper but just wondering 'out loud' as to whether it is a possibility given the location etc.

EDIT: Having looked into the possibility, I've found that Heatherlea list Marsh Sandpiper as a target species on their Poland holiday though more to the west of the country, rather than to the south (may also be possible there though).
 
Last edited:
Hello,

thanks to all for commenting!
I considered Marsh SP too, but dismissed it by what seems to be too short and slighty too stocky (?) legs. But then I was reminded not to lay much confidence in features here. Thanks again Butty: still unIDable for me.

And a typo in post 13: Marsh Sandpiper and not Marsh Warbler
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top