• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Common Gull with red on bill? Coventry UK (1 Viewer)

stevethehydra

Well-known member
Seen in Swanswell Park, Coventry on 30th December, a couple of Common Gulls among the Black-headed... this one seemed odd to me because it appeared to have the "red spot" on its bill like the larger Larus gulls (Herring, LBB, GBB, etc). My understanding was that Common Gull never normally has this. Definitely a Common in all other aspects (size, structure, leg colour, etc). Thoughts?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/126840895@N05/31938671182/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/126840895@N05/31711540570/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/126840895@N05/31969050791/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/126840895@N05/32047904066/in/dateposted-public/

Also perhaps noteworthy a BHG with a "faded" version of the breeding plumage hood rather than the usual winter plumage:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/126840895@N05/31276522843/in/dateposted-public/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/126840895@N05/31711554950/in/dateposted-public/
 
Last edited:
And the BHG is acquiring its hood - some birds get their hoods much earlier than others, or keep them much later, and this is not uncommon.

Mick
 
Thanks, didn't really think it was anything other than a Common Gull, just wondered if it was unusual. I have seen black markings on the bill of CG before, but (I thought) not on those that otherwise looked adult, so I had assumed it was an immature plumage thing... and it did look (to me, at the time) more red than black on this one! But happy to put it down to within-species variation.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 8 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top