• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Gracanicanetta happi gen. et sp. nov. (1 Viewer)

albertonykus

Well-known member
Bocheński, Z.M., J. Happ, G. Salwa, and T. Tomek (2025)
The first fossil bird from the Miocene swamps of Gračanica, Bosnia and Herzegovina: a novel and very unique duck
Palaeontologia Electronica 28: 14
doi: 10.26879/1512

The authors describe a nearly complete skeleton of a new genus and species of duck from the Middle Miocene, preserved on a slab. The skull, mandible, sternum and pelvis are also preserved, making this specimen even more unique. This is the first fossil duck with documented gastroliths. The gastroliths appear as a cluster of several dozen polished stones in a place that anatomically corresponds to the approximate location of the gizzard in ducks. This is also the first fossil bird from the Gračanica site, which has long been known for numerous early Middle Miocene fossils, ranging from large mammals and mollusks, and more recently also for fish, amphibians and reptiles, as well as arthropods, insects, sponges, protists, macroflora and plant pollen. The specimen displays a mosaic of primitive and advanced characters that are not exclusive to one tribe of ducks, therefore, apart from excluding Anatini, its systematic affiliation cannot be precisely indicated. However, we have sufficient reason to believe that at least in the ecological sense it was a diving duck.
 
Currently, this paper is not validly published.
Although three ZooBank identifiers appear in the html version, the .pdf has "Zoobank to be supplied by EE" instead of each of these identifiers.
The ZooBank data must be "in the work itself"; an html page does not qualify as a published work; "the work itself" is the .pdf version.
 
Currently, this paper is not validly published.
Although three ZooBank identifiers appear in the html version, the .pdf has "Zoobank to be supplied by EE" instead of each of these identifiers.
The ZooBank data must be "in the work itself"; an html page does not qualify as a published work; "the work itself" is the .pdf version.

Problem solved now, thanks to the journal editor.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top