• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Kowa Ts 501 & 502 Scopes (1 Viewer)

birchall

Brendan Power
I am looking for a lightweight rugged scope for treking (and to keep in boot of car). I may also need to carry it in a backpack while mountain biking.
I note a lot of dealers are selling these at fairly good discount prices at the moment. I think they are being discontinued.

Can anybody advise on the quality of these, please?

I think they come with either 20X or 20-40X zoom eyepieces but I think the eyepieces are built in i.e. no option to change eyepiece later. Is this so?

My current scope is TSN 883 but I don't want to carry that on a mountain bike. Will there be a huge drop in optical quality in the 500 seies?
 
Yes, there will be Huuuuge drop in optical quality. They lack contrast and FOV. I think the zoom one has too narrow AFOV. I remenber it has much less than 50 degrees.
And you are right about eyepiece. They are built-in so you can't change the eyepiece.

I have a TS-502 and swarovski ATS80HD. When I go mountain, I would bring Ts-501 or binocular doubler-adapter(2x, so 8.5x2=17x). They are very light and compact. Their view is not good but better than nothing and I don't want carry a heavy scope when I go climbing.

If I go to sea or lake, I wouldn't hesitate a second to bring ATS80.

I think the best compact scope would be Nikon ED50 but I can't justfy the cost and ED50 is much hevier than TS-502. So I am satisfied with my TS-502.

Katsu
 
I agree you'll see a huge drop in optical quality going from an 883 to a 501, and yes you're right the eyepeice cannot be changed. I used to have a 501 and it certainly did the job, sure it's not as good as a big ED scope, for the money it's a decent little scope. I'd also echo the point that the Nikon ED50 is significantly better than the 501, though it would cost you a good deal more.
 
I have the 504, a seemingly little known Kowa scope that may be of interest. It has a 15-30 zoom (non-removable) eyepiece and also has ED glass.

It actually isn't bad at all and is even possible to handhold. I used it this morning in fact in a vain attempt to catch the offshore Red Necked Pharalope passage (I was a day or so too late).
 
Thaanks to all for the replies and advice. You've saved me making an expensive mistake. I'll check out the Brunton. It looks interesting.

Brendan
 
Hi Brendan, I am in the curious position of having the Kowa TS501, the Opticron MM2 (non-ED), and the Nikon ED50. They are of a quality that ascends in that order. Despite the poorer optics of the Kowa, I do like it, because it's very light, pocketable, and I take it on the bicycle quite a lot. The 20x eyepiece isn't interchangeable, it exhibits lots of flare, the FOV isn't as wide as the MM2 or ED50, but it's very cute. (It even came with a little teeny-weeny baby Skua stay-on case!). The mini-scope I never use anymore is the MM2. The ED50 has had lots of deserving praise heaped on it, and I use it more than my ED82 now. But for cycling or hill-walking trips, the Kowa TS501 is fine, but you might consider the MM2....at least it has interchangeable eyepieces.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 17 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top