• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

My Outback (2003 VII) (1 Viewer)

birdman

Орнитол&
After a couple of evening strolls it was time for an early trip around the Outback again.

Same route as usual (we will do something different eventually!!!), and unexpectedly added three more to the running total of species.

I committed the cardinal sin of forgetting to take a field guide with me this morning (!!!) but fortunately the absence of any guide didn’t make any difference today. (Phew!)

This morning it was cloudy at 8.15ish when we set off with a threat of drizzle that never really materialised.

Very evident this morning was the number of young Great Tits. We came across one small group of 6 or perhaps more noisy youngsters. I don’t know whether these will be unrelated fledglings taking their first adventures together, or whether it is more likely they are a single brood. Perhaps the latter, as I did see one example of some very hungry wing-fluttering going on, which, although I didn’t see an adult bird, I assume was immediately prior to receiving a nutritious morsel!

As usual on the morning trips, there was plenty of birdsong that I didn’t recognise – and one sighting of a warbler that is still beyond me. At the minute, any greeny-browny-creamy warbler that I see is logged in the memory banks as “poss. Chiffchaff” (as there are clearly plenty of those about) unless it opens its beak and tells me otherwise. You might have guessed this one didn’t!

However, in my attempts to keep an eye on it for a more definite identification, I stumbled across, perhaps the same Goldcrest as in a previous trio. (Same tree!) As I was trying to track down the warbler, Partnyorsha noticed our today’s first new addition – although it wasn’t until we arrived back home did we found out we hadn’t recorded Dunnock on our patch before.

Approaching the area where we have previously heard Turtle Doves – but not for a little while – we were pleased to hear at least one again.

Actually, in spite of what I wrote earlier, me and Partnyorsha split up to take slight different routes home (she could hear the coffee and croissants calling and so took the shorter route!). Just as we set off on our separate ways, we saw the second new addition, as a Jay flew across a little way ahead of us.

I took a slightly longer route, and after a while I could here the now recognisable singing of some Whitethroat in the shrubbery. Although these little chaps seem quite common now that I have managed to track them down, I still like to get as good a look as possible. So I focussed my attention (and binocs) on one of the bushes whence I could here a song emanating.

After a few unsuccessful minutes, I decided the song must be coming from the area directly behind the bush, and so I moved to check out the tall spindly plants behind. Even without binoculars, it was obvious there was a bird sitting prominently on one of these plants. So I looked through the binoculars, and saw my third new addition, a Reed Bunting.

I was a little surprised, although subsequent reading has suggested I shouldn’t be, but the sighting of this male does lend a little credence to the strikingly marked, but nonetheless LBJ that I have on my garden list from during the winter. The best candidate I could find was female Reed Bunting. Maybe I was right after all!

Anyway, the list of 29 birds seen or heard (*) today is as follows:



Blackbird
Blue Tit
Carrion Crow
Chaffinch
Chiffchaff *
Collared Dove *
Coot
Dunnock
Feral Pigeon
Goldcrest
Great Tit
Green Woodpecker *
House Martin
Jackdaw *
Jay
Lapwing
Long-tailed Tit
Magpie
Mallard
Moorhen
Reed Bunting
Robin
Skylark
Starling
Swift
Turtle Dove *
Whitethroat
Wood Pigeon
Yellowhammer
 
hi birdman
good list, just a thought could your greeny_browny_creamy birdie
be a willow warbler, _wood warbler.
bert
 
I thinks there's every chance it could be either, but as it steadfastly refused to sing, I have no idea. (Not yet good enough to tel them apart by sight!)
 
Wood warbler is quite a yellow bird compared to a Willow but there can be some dull ones as a few people have told me. Sometimes they have looked at what they thought to be a Willow or somethign even rarer and then they hear theWood's song. I'd not be disappointed whichever way it's identification went.
 
As long as it goes at least one way!!!

I've been trying to put a bit of thought into how many birds I might see in 2003. (Although I didn't start until May, I'm gonna maintain a calendar year count)

I think the Turtle Dove is pretty good (thanks Carlos), but there's a few "obvious" birds missing. No Rook, no Buzzard (there's one circling around a couple of miles away, but hasn't made it here yet!), no definitely ided geese and only one gull, and then, perhaps the winter specialists.

At the moment I'm on 48, and 100 would be great but, whaddaya reckon??? 75 more realistic? 60?

Whatever, I'll keep everyone posted.
 
You're going to keep to your patch for the Yearlist, Birdman? As a mathematician, you'll appreciate that number of species is in direct proportion to time expended... especially during fall migration, now that spring has passed.

Perhaps we can derive a formula. N=no. of species, t= time in the field (sober and with binoculars) in hours, so we have N=kt, where k is the Birder's Konstant (smaller than Graham's Number but larger than a Graham cracker). Now, if N is required to be 100, then N/k = 100/k = t, so you'd better get out there and get busy logging field hours if you want to reach the century mark.

Good luck!

PS. Is there any way of transferring your Outback reports to the Patch Forum?
 
Birdman, try looking at each reasonable British bird (not Pallas Grasshopper Warbler!) and assessing it's possibility in your patch then you should come to a target number. Doing this will increase your awareness of what habitats you should look in for certain birds too. Considering only the probable birds means any rarity is a brilliant bonus worth two ticks (not literally) as it is a tick you did not expect and pushes the total.
 
Andrew, that's brilliant advice - and like all brilliant advice, it's obvious once someone else has told it to you!!!

Charles, now that I've stopped laughing out loud, I can answer you as well.

Actually, I don't know how to get the Patch reports over into the Patch Forum, but I'm considering the tried an tested method of cut and paste - although I'll try asking admin to nove them first, I think!
 
Nice one Charles. It looks like Birdman will have to carry a calculator in the field as well as his bins.

Also, Birdman, for variety why don'y you take the square root next time you're out!

Dave
 
Warning! This thread is more than 22 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top