Many years ago when I used my Nikon F Photomic Ftn, lovely camera, prime lenses were the only way to achieve quality, zooms were young and poor, even up to a few years ago, however...
Does anyone really buy a prime lens now, oh yes I know they do, but surely the majority buy zoom.
Prime lenses DO give better quality on the whole I know, I accept that but to the "average" user, zooms are better, surely.
I remember when I used to carry a 28mm, 50mm, 135mm, 200mm, 300mm and 500mm, 20 rolls of film, camera, Weston euromaster, and filters.
Now I carry a body, 28-135 and 120-500 and two 32Gb memory cards. My son a body and 28-300.
For the average person place an A3 from a prime 400 next to a zoom 400 of a decent price and they won't know the difference, surely.
Polite, "calm" non sarcastic replies please.
Does anyone really buy a prime lens now, oh yes I know they do, but surely the majority buy zoom.
Prime lenses DO give better quality on the whole I know, I accept that but to the "average" user, zooms are better, surely.
I remember when I used to carry a 28mm, 50mm, 135mm, 200mm, 300mm and 500mm, 20 rolls of film, camera, Weston euromaster, and filters.
Now I carry a body, 28-135 and 120-500 and two 32Gb memory cards. My son a body and 28-300.
For the average person place an A3 from a prime 400 next to a zoom 400 of a decent price and they won't know the difference, surely.
Polite, "calm" non sarcastic replies please.