Its official!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/3653939.stm
and now I'm retiring to a safe distance
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/3653939.stm
and now I'm retiring to a safe distance
Jane Turner said:The point is not that Sparrowhawks and Peregrines take Pigeons - clearly they do take a few, its that less than 1% of lost Pigeons are attributatble to Sparrowhawks and less than 2% to Peregrines, which leaves 97% of losses to other factors, which sort of weakens argument, made in some quarters to control, raptor populations.
Hi JaneJane Turner said:The point is not that Sparrowhawks and Peregrines take Pigeons - clearly they do take a few, its that less than 1% of lost Pigeons are attributatble to Sparrowhawks and less than 2% to Peregrines, which leaves 97% of losses to other factors, which sort of weakens argument, made in some quarters to control, raptor populations.
The Tom said:In my opinion the study is flawed as is shown by conclusion 1.7 and afraid the raptors are not quite off the hook yet .
I quote from the report:Ranger James said:On a point of order - the 1% figure quoted here and by jane, does that mean 1% of total pigeon numbers, or 1% of all pigeon mortality.
James
robinm said:I quote from the report:
"... Management of sparrowhawks, therefore, should be directed at the level of the individual loft with the deployment of deterrent techniques."
The following quotation is taken from The Scottish Homing Union's (SHU)response to the report in question:-
'The SHU is concerned that, after the experimental testing of loft area deterrants was dropped from the research programme, the CSL report now concludes that experimental trials of deterrants in the loft area need to be carried out. As we have stated many times before, our members have tested all known deterrants to destruction. If they worked we would be already using them and so would the gamekeepers at their release pens. As the University of Lancaster review pointed out, the proponents of deterrents should first demonstrate that a particular deterrent has an aversive effect on the target raptor before they suggest a potential real-life application of the technique.
'As we do not even know if any of the proposed deterrents have an aversive effect on the target raptors, it is little more than supposition to state that they might have some potential application in the sparrowhawk and racing pigeon problem. The methods suggested are a combination and permutation of those already tried and failed by pigeon fanciers. Aversion therapies would involve coating all of our birds with chemicals or attaching sprays to them, which would be triggered by an attack to spray the raptor. These are impractical, ludicrous and potentially dangerous suggestions.'
Having tried most of the deterrents myself, I can confirm that they either work for a very limited period, or else don't work at all. As for smearing evil-smelling and tasting chemical substances onto our pigeons' feathers, I believe the RSPCA might just have something to say about the cruelty aspect of this hair-brained notion - and rightly so too!
Ranger James said:I do not believe that these losses are unacceptable. If you can't face the possability of losing a bird to a native predator, you simply do not race it.
James
Jane Turner said:The point Antony is that perhaps there is more value in doing something to reduce the 97% of losses that are not due to raptors!
Anthony Morton said:Then what do you suggest, Jayne?
Ranger James said:The nub of the argument as far as I am concerned is highlighted in the first introductory paragraph:
"For some time the SHU has been concerned over the number of raptor attacks on racing pigeons reported by their members and belives that thier occurance is unacceptably high..."
I do not believe that these losses are unacceptable. If you can't face the possability of losing a bird to a native predator, you simply do not race it.
James
Jane Turner said:Start to look into what the other causes might be and take steps to reduce them... you are the pigeon expert!
just as well jane as i have got my snow balls readyJane Turner said:Its official!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/3653939.stm
and now I'm retiring to a safe distance![]()
Hi James my of the hook quote was just a bit of poetic licence . There is no doubt that the racing pigeon does contribute to the success of the Peregrine as has been shown in the Richards and Shrubb et al 2003 report that states The increase and decrease in the pigeon component of the Peregrines diet coinsides with the start and finish of the racing season indicating THE IMPORTANCE of the racing pigeon as a food supply .Ranger James said:Hi Tom,
I am yet to read the study, but will do with these comments firmly in mind. I do however contest this last point - in that I do not believe raptors to be on any kind of hook in the first place. I am yet to be convinced that pigeon racing is sustaining an artificailly inflated raptor population in this country.
On a point of order - the 1% figure quoted here and by jane, does that mean 1% of total pigeon numbers, or 1% of all pigeon mortality.
James