• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Unnatural geometry of "field-flattened" binoculars? (1 Viewer)

Henry:

I recall a photo you posted some years ago, about the edge distortion or lack of with the Swarovision.

That would be good to post again. There are advantages to the flat field optics. There are differences,
Nikon started it with the SE series, then the LX, HG, and the EDG. These are very pleasing to most users.

Allbinos is a good source for their observations of the many kinds of distortion, in their reviews.

Jerry

Zeiss has done well in my experience with the SF.
 
Hi Jerry,

Here are some threads with photos of distortion in Swarovisions and others, including a Nikon SE and EDG.

http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=161309

http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=175077

http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=237219

http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=308250

http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=313034

No photos in the last one, just my description of the distortion I saw in a Zeiss 8x42 SF.

IMO Albinos is one of the worst sources for information on distortion. They seem to be aware of the existence of only one type, pincushion. They treat it as a defect rather than a design choice and they use a subjective and unreliable method to "measure" it.

Henry
 
IMO Albinos is one of the worst sources for information on distortion. They seem to be aware of the existence of only one type, pincushion. They treat it as a defect rather than a design choice and they use a subjective and unreliable method to "measure" it.

Henry

Indeed, and it can affect a binoculars final rankings.

If they were ever to test the Canon 10x42L you would have the binocular scoring a 9 or 10/10 in the category 'Blurring at the edge of the FOV' because it's a flat field design and perhaps 3/10 in 'Distortion the distance of the first curved line from the field centre'. The reality is Canon optical designers know exactly what they are doing dialling in pincushion.

These WWII German rangefinders would be interesting to look through. Coastal battery and AA 1943
 

Attachments

  • Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-113-0006-34,_Nordeuropa,_Küstenbatterie,_Entfernungsmesser.jpg
    Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-113-0006-34,_Nordeuropa,_Küstenbatterie,_Entfernungsmesser.jpg
    64.5 KB · Views: 62
  • Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-110-1699-21,_Nordeuropa,_Küstenbatterie,_Entfernungsmesser.jpg
    Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-110-1699-21,_Nordeuropa,_Küstenbatterie,_Entfernungsmesser.jpg
    59.2 KB · Views: 64
  • Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-J08361,_Entfernungsmesser_einer_Vierlings-Flak.jpg
    Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-J08361,_Entfernungsmesser_einer_Vierlings-Flak.jpg
    38.4 KB · Views: 69
Last edited:
.....
.....
.....
IMO Albinos is one of the worst sources for information on distortion. They seem to be aware of the existence of only one type, pincushion. They treat it as a defect rather than a design choice and they use a subjective and unreliable method to "measure" it.

Henry

Thank you, Henry, I think you are absolutely right.

Canip
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top