• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Common or less common gull? Leeds UK, September (1 Viewer)

stevethehydra

Well-known member
Saw a couple of Common Gull threads and was reminded of this gull I saw on a roof in Leeds on September 2nd. I was a bit perplexed by it at the time, as it seemed larger than a Common or Black-headed, but smaller than a Herring or any close relative - maybe approaching the smaller end of Lesser Black-backed size. (I know size estimation is problematic on a lone bird, but while no other bird was on the same roof with it, there were Common and BHGs on another nearby roof visible at the same time, and a crow and a pigeon flew near it, so I feel like my impression of size was fairly accurate...)

It also looked quite long-legged and very long-winged, and darker-mantled than a "normal-looking" Common Gull on the other roof (last pic with the BHG, included for comparison). I was leaning towards it being a runty, slightly pale-looking LBBG at the time, but on looking at the photos at home it clearly looks more like a Common Gull. Just individual variation, or could it be something like the Russian subspecies?
 

Attachments

  • Common and BHG.JPG
    Common and BHG.JPG
    497.7 KB · Views: 43
  • gull4.JPG
    gull4.JPG
    229.1 KB · Views: 42
  • gull3.JPG
    gull3.JPG
    186.3 KB · Views: 47
  • gull2.JPG
    gull2.JPG
    208.7 KB · Views: 50
  • gull1.JPG
    gull1.JPG
    241.6 KB · Views: 52
in a standing bird you'd look for bright bare parts, whitish head with a shawl and a small p9 mirror for russian heinei - nothing of this being visible in these pics.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top