Hello everyone!
I have been birding since last summer and have found myself in a lot of situations where a scope would have been very useful beside my binoculars.
So recently I started looking for scopes. I set my budget at around 1000€ for both the scope and tripod(+head).
After some research I found myself left with two (at least in my opinion) decent options.
1. Getting a new nikon Prostaff 5 82-A with 20-60x eyepiece along with a new Manfrotto 055 series tripod + a decent head. This would leave me at a total of around 900-950€.
2. I've found an offer for a quite heavily used but recently serviced (by Swarovski) Swarovski Habicht AT80 HD with 20-60x eyepiece along with an old Manfrotto 055 for the cost of 1200€ total.
So my question is: Should I choose option 1 or spend a couple 100 more and choose option 2? Or do you think that both these options are bad and you have a better recommendation? I'm open for any suggestions.
Best regards!
I have been birding since last summer and have found myself in a lot of situations where a scope would have been very useful beside my binoculars.
So recently I started looking for scopes. I set my budget at around 1000€ for both the scope and tripod(+head).
After some research I found myself left with two (at least in my opinion) decent options.
1. Getting a new nikon Prostaff 5 82-A with 20-60x eyepiece along with a new Manfrotto 055 series tripod + a decent head. This would leave me at a total of around 900-950€.
2. I've found an offer for a quite heavily used but recently serviced (by Swarovski) Swarovski Habicht AT80 HD with 20-60x eyepiece along with an old Manfrotto 055 for the cost of 1200€ total.
So my question is: Should I choose option 1 or spend a couple 100 more and choose option 2? Or do you think that both these options are bad and you have a better recommendation? I'm open for any suggestions.
Best regards!
Last edited: