I didn't when I wrote to my MP about the Buzzard matter. As usual with these letters he passed it on to the relevant body (Natural England in this case) to draft a reply for him to sign. This took the form of a letter bearing the name of the Chief Executive of Natural England, but actually signed on his behalf by one of his underlings, who had merely cut-and-pasted a statement from NE's website (which I had already read) and which totally ignored all the questions I had actually asked. I wonder if the signatory had even read my letter properly. I wrote back to my MP pointing out what a shoddy, unprofessional reply it was and saying that I was dismayed that he had thought it appropriate to put his name to it. He promised to look into it further when parliament resumed after the summer break, but he hasn't. The whole exchange was just a fob-off - which of course they always are, but in this case it was even more blatant than usual. It hardly matters whether my MP's failure to follow up was an oversight or deliberate. The message is clearly that he doesn't care. If he did he would have made sure he did something. Civil servants' prime concern is to stop the mess hitting the fan. So long as they succeed in doing that the government can enact whatever policies it sees fit and not care what disastrous results transpire because everything is hunky-dory. And when they fail to achieve the impossible and the mess does hit the fan then, more often than not nowadays, it's deemed to be the civil servants' fault. You can no longer assume that the minister will always take responsibility for his policies.