A friend owns a camera shop that sells many scopes and binos - but not many "birding" binos. It always surprises me that most binos sold are probably not to birdwatchers! So, it might be that Zeiss are very popular, say, with race goers or sailing types? Mind you - once upon a little while ago, I envied the many birders whoi had Zeiss around their necks. Fashion, huh? Or crafty marketing! I think I bought my Nikon ED82 partly out of contempt for the fashionable brands - and I'm sure their binos are up their with the very best if not ahead of them!Leif said:I have the impression that the Nikon 8x42 are becoming more popular here although I see far more Leica, Swaro and Zeiss BGAT. Oddly enough I have never seen a Zeiss Victory in the field. Maybe here magazine reviews determine purchases. Sad if true given how rubbish such reviews are.
scampo said:"Who needs magazine reviews eh! Scampo how do you rate the various optics when wearing glasses?... Sleeper"
I couldn't agree more. The only binoculars I can truly say I feel entirely comfortably using while I wear my (long-sighted) specs on is Nikon's Sporter 8x36s. My own Swaro EL8.5s hardly allow a full view so I find myself removing them 90% of the time. Same with scopes - my Nikon ED82 allows a lovely full FOV - but only at at 25x, my son's Swaro 65, only at 20x. So frustrating - I think I'll have to buy one of those things that you hang your glasses on - as pretentious as I have always thought they looked!
When I read how so many binos and scopes state that they allow the use of specs, I often wonder what's wrong with my own!
marcus said:Gorank
Whats vignetting? Darkness?
marcus
gorank said:Vignetting is when the view seems darker around the edges than in the middle. I see it when I look at an even but poor illuminated object such as a grey sky.
Could be me in combination with my glasses, but I think the binos must be guilty in some way...
pduxon said:check out the reviews on www.betterviewdesired.com
scampoWhen I read how so many binos and scopes state that they allow the use of specs said:How true! It would seem that all those specifications are made under the assumption that a person has the specs extremely close to his eyes (with the corresponding higher chance of them fogging up in hot and humid conditions).
Justin said:I have recently checked out the Swarovski 7x42slc and 8x30slc, along with the Leica 8x32bn and 8x42bn. I have also looked at the Leica Ultra 8x42. I am trying to choose the best all around binocular. I'll be using them for various activities and am looking for the best multi-purpose. Any comments?
I don't usually outright disagree with anyone, but, in this case, I must! I have purchased and sold Nikon binoculars on eBay. I did that because it was the easiest way to give them all an extensive try-out (no local shops carry any high end except B&L Elites), and it lost me virtually NO money. If you were to go to your local shop and buy an 8x32 HG and then sell it on eBay, you would lose. But if you buy and sell on eBay, the loss is negligable. I have had 6 pairs of top of the line Nikons: 2 pairs of the 8x32 SE (I have kept one pair), a pair of 8x42 HG, a pair of 8x32 HG, a pair of 10x32 HG (I have kept those) and a pair of 10x42 SE (I have kept those). Never was I disappointed in any of them, but am keeping the three pair that suit me the best under the different circumstances in which my wife and I bird. The three I kept are the lighest for their particular strengths. One pair is waterproof and 10 power for those days at the beach when it rains (my wife would not be there in the rain). One pair is eight power, wide angle, has the BEST optics and is very light for those days in the bush (if my wife is with me she prefers the roof prism 10 power pair always). And one pair is for all other circumatances - bright, the best resolution, and acceptably light. When I think that I have all three of these (all were brand new) for just a bit more money than 1 pair of Swaro's, I think myself brilliant (and thank Nikon profusely). And I am not alone in my opinions.Raptor said:Hello Justin, one area to consider is retained value, Leica, Swaro and Zeiss, hold the value better than any others out there (sorry all you nikon users) but them is the facts, if you ever want to sell your binos you to upgrade you will find that the top three will get a very good return on investment, Raptor.
Raptor said:Hello Justin, one area to consider is retained value, Leica, Swaro and Zeiss, hold the value better than any others out there (sorry all you nikon users) but them is the facts, if you ever want to sell your binos you to upgrade you will find that the top three will get a very good return on investment, Raptor.
I agree Lief, and I saw a pair of Swaro's also go for a low price ($430 I believe) on eBay because the title wasn't worded so that the search engine would find them easily and the auction was short (and the owner didn't set a high starting point). So bargains can be found on anything, and I'm glad of that (speaking selfishly).Leif said:I could not disagree more. In my experience in the UK Nikon binoculars retain their value extremely well, and certainly as well as posh European brands. The quality of top end Nikon binoculars is widely recognised esp. by specialist dealers. However, it is still sometimes possible to buy used Nikon 8x32 SE and Nikon 8x30 EII at low prices as some people do not realise their true value.