A lot of binoculars have field flatteners. You can easily tell if they do or not. That is how they achieve a flat sharp field edge to edge. My point is the 8x25 CL-P has sharper edges than the 8x30 CL. I had the 8x30 CL's for at least 6 months so I had plenty of time to evaluate them. They show more glare than the 8x25 CL-P's also. Saying "Shut-Up" is a childish way to get out of an argument that you are losing. HaHa! It is like the kid on the playground saying "Shut-up,Shut-up....". Here is what Binomania thought about the CL-P's and field flatness.I noticed the same with my CL. Isn't it the case (in bins with no field flatteners) that bins with narrow
FOV will be sharper out towards the edges than bins with wide FOV
due to the ocular design differences between the two? I thought I read about this
here on the forum recently.
"Curvature of field and distortion angular
CL The Swarovski Pocket 10 × 25 probably does not have all the technology products SWAROVISION:, nevertheless possesses a characteristic and is a field definitely paved. In practical images are enjoyable to the very edges of the field. Do you notice any appreciable difference between center and edge. At this juncture I think it is the best compact binoculars currently available. Also thanks to the modest apparent field I have not noticed the effect rolling ball during panning.
binoculars I found it a very comfortable and natural to use, a feature that is usually found in binoculars from a larger diameter."
Last edited: