Wimpy
Well-known member
I couldn't find an appropriate thread to ask this question, so here goes.
I am in the process of buying a better scope. At present I have a "Piccolo" scope so as the song says "the only way is up"!
I had the opportunity to compare some scopes at the weekend and in the process took two images with two scopes side by side. The images were taken on Panasonic TZ7 under similar conditions, sadly not on the same subject, but the same distance away (approx 40m) and the same light conditions. Both were hand-held with no remote shutter, just point and shoot!
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/phot...?authkey=Gv1sRgCJjOjNeczMGMBg&feat=directlink
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/phot...?authkey=Gv1sRgCJjOjNeczMGMBg&feat=directlink
I would welcome any comments about the quality of the images with regards to the scopes involved. One was a reasonably price quality scope and the other a few hundred pounds more. I have not associated an image with a scope as I would like an un biased opinion.
Thanks in Advance
Wimpy
I am in the process of buying a better scope. At present I have a "Piccolo" scope so as the song says "the only way is up"!
I had the opportunity to compare some scopes at the weekend and in the process took two images with two scopes side by side. The images were taken on Panasonic TZ7 under similar conditions, sadly not on the same subject, but the same distance away (approx 40m) and the same light conditions. Both were hand-held with no remote shutter, just point and shoot!
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/phot...?authkey=Gv1sRgCJjOjNeczMGMBg&feat=directlink
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/phot...?authkey=Gv1sRgCJjOjNeczMGMBg&feat=directlink
I would welcome any comments about the quality of the images with regards to the scopes involved. One was a reasonably price quality scope and the other a few hundred pounds more. I have not associated an image with a scope as I would like an un biased opinion.
Thanks in Advance
Wimpy