• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Blossomcrown (1 Viewer)

Richard Klim

-------------------------
Forthcoming...

Lozano-Jaramillo, Rico-Guevara & Cadena (in review). Genetic differentiation, niche divergence, and the origin and maintenance of the disjunct distribution in the Blossomcrown Anthocephala floriceps (Aves, Trochilidae).
 

Thanks: "The evidence for marked divergence and reciprocal monophyly in mitochondrial and nuclear loci, in addition to climatic differentiation and morphological diagnosability, implies that each population could be considered a full species under several species concepts [67]–[71]."
Another one to look fo on the next trip!

cheers, alan
 
AOU-SACC...
47cc. Lozano-Jaramillo et al. (2014) found that the two subspecies are strongly differentiated not only genetically but also in climatic niche space, and suggested that the subspecies berlepschi of the Andes may warrant treatment as a separate species from the nominate subspecies of the Santa Martas. SACC proposal needed.
Züchner & de Juana 2014 (HBW Alive)...
Race berlepschi differs in having largely white tips to tail.
 
Yes, those are much better English names. Some Colombia-linked people got SACC to adopt "Sierra Nevada Brush Finch" for an endemic Arremon of Santa Marta, with the obvious name being preoccupied by an Atlapetes. I am not sure other alternatives (e.g. "Colombian" in our ProAves checklist) are much better, but totally agree with Jaramillo's comments on "Sierra Nevada" being a bad name for a bird that occurs nowhere near the snow line. Also, it could be from Spain, California or all sorts of other places with their own Sierra Nevadas (snow mountains).

It was difficult to get very excited about this proposal either way. We will probably follow suit on the Colombia checklist, but it is another case of research groups linked to committee getting a pretty easy ride at SACC. It's not worth proposing other taxa in a similar situation (range disjunction, moderate differentiataion in plumage and DNA, no vocal study) for papers with a different authorship.
 
Last edited:
Wow! Stiles' data and the photos certainly make it easy to accept this split- most convincing!

Still a shame all this was not included in the paper which proposed the change and my comments above re SACC approaches for different groups' research papers remain... What happened to all those temporarily withdrawn Zimmerius proposals anyway?
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top