• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Banded Pitta (1 Viewer)

Richard Klim

-------------------------
Rheindt & Eaton 2010. Biological species limits in the Banded Pitta Pitta guajana. Forktail 26: 86-91.

"Based on their morphological, vocal and ecological differences that equal or exceed those among other Pitta species, and based on their taxon integrity despite continual geographic contact throughout much of the past three million years, we propose biological species status for both P. schwaneri and P. irena as distinct from P. guajana. We propose that each of these three species be recognised as monotypic. As English names, we propose Malayan Banded Pitta, Bornean Banded Pitta and Javan Banded Pitta for P. irena, P.schwaneri and P. guajana, respectively. The name Banded Pitta should continue to be applied to the group as a whole. The retention of the word 'Banded' combined with a geographic attribute in the common name ensures that there is no confusion between old treatments and new ones that accept this split."​

Richard

PS. I see that Frank Rheindt has a couple of other interesting papers in submission:

  • Rheindt, Álvarez Alonso, Norman & Christidis. A molecular and vocal case for sympatric sibling species in the fuscous flycatcher Cnemotriccus fuscatus. J Avian Biol.
  • Rheindt & Verbelen. A taxonomic reappraisal of the Maroon-chinned Fruit-Dove Ptilinopus subgularis complex based on morphology and vocalizations. Forktail.
http://www.oeb.harvard.edu/faculty/edwards/people/Frank.htm
 
Last edited:
Pitta guajana

Rheindt & Eaton 2010. Biological species limits in the Banded Pitta Pitta guajana. Forktail 26: 86-91.

"...We propose that each of these three species be recognised as monotypic. As English names, we propose Malayan Banded Pitta, Bornean Banded Pitta and Javan Banded Pitta for P. irena, P.schwaneri and P. guajana, respectively..."​

Richard

And what happens with Pitta guajana ripley?
 
Ripleyi

And what happens with Pitta guajana ripley?
"Our own examination of ... a range of BMNH specimens of both ripleyi and irena has only shown potential weak geographical trends in some plumage characters, but none that would definitively separate them. Therefore, we support Lambert & Woodcock's (2003) synonymisation of ripleyi."

Richard
 
P. g. ripleyi

"Our own examination of ... a range of BMNH specimens of both ripleyi and irena has only shown potential weak geographical trends in some plumage characters, but none that would definitively separate them. Therefore, we support Lambert & Woodcock's (2003) synonymisation of ripleyi."

Richard

Thanks Richard.
So :gn: ripleyi
 
Fortunately I mentioned to Chris to make sure he got all the Banded Pittas so he made sure he did. All three species of banded Pitta are now monotypic given the weak differences from the specimens at the BMNH - I couldn't actually detect any!

Expect a few more taxonomic papers on the Asian avifauna in the next year from Frank and myself, still plenty to follow up on....

Cheers,

James
 
Chris Gooddie's book was reviewed by Steve Rutt on BirdGuides yesterday:
http://www.birdguides.com/webzine/article.asp?a=2291

Richard

Funny he mentions the cover design - I did offer to do a full-colour painting for the front cover (for free even!!)...but apparently the publishers didn't want a bird on it so as not to put off non-birders.....??? Who else, other than a birder is gonna read it? Having a cryptic cover means they'll just pick it up, read the gumph and think, oh no, it's about crappy birds and put it back!! Odd
 
that second review is much more agreeable. Funny how both reviewers focused on several of the same issues but related to them in completely opposite ways
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top