• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Deer (apologies!) - Grand Canyon USA (1 Viewer)

Astrokev

Well-known member
Apologies this is obviously not a bird, but was photographed whilst on a birding trip, so does that count?

Deer resident in this area are, I believe, Mule and White-tailed. Unfortunately, the hind quarters are hidden, making ID difficult for those of us unfamiliar with US mammal species.

Please could someone confirm an ID?

Thanks
Kevin
 

Attachments

  • Grand Canyon-16Jul13-36.jpg
    Grand Canyon-16Jul13-36.jpg
    335.8 KB · Views: 153
Deer resident in this area are, I believe, Mule and White-tailed. Unfortunately, the hind quarters are hidden, making ID difficult for those of us unfamiliar with US mammal species.

Please could someone confirm an ID?

Thanks
Kevin

That looks like a Wapiti (American counterpart of Red Deer, only bulkier). It is a big bulky animal, seen in Yellowstone documentaries chased by wolves in snow. The Mule and White-tailed species are more delicate thin-legged animals, more like impalas compared to wapiti's kudu.

And Chris brings up the well-known confusion about "elk". Americans call the big red-deer-like animal "elk" and the palmate-antlered one "moose", while in "European English" ("field guide English") there is a red deer and the palmate-antlered animal is "elk".
Now when it is translated into an unrelated language (as in a nature documentary), you get the situation that for half an episode you get an explanation how wolves hunt (word) and then the sentence "but when they hunt (the same word) they use a different technique"... ???
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top