I had a pair of Leica 8x20 binos on hold and the more I read, the more I thought they might be too small. I was looking for binos smaller than my Pentax DCF WP 8x42. Easy to store in the car, lighter for hiking and able to use for some astronomy. (I have scopes for serious astronomy).
I compared them to the Leupold Katmai 8x32's before I decided to buy them. I was ready to buy the Leupolds because they were smaller than the Nikons. (I will apologize now for not knowing the correct terms.) I was surprised that the Nikons seemed to show less curvature at the outer edge of the FOV (straight post) and appeared to be sharper farther out in the FOV.
So far so good.
Then I went out tonight to compare the Pentax to the Nikons. The Nikons showed a big X on all bright lights. It is evident on the moon and on street lights. The X had a greater angle on the top and bottom. It is really obvious. Then I noticed it on the Pentax also. The angle on the X on the Pentax is greater on the left and right, and about half or less the brightness of the Nikon X. If anyone has looked through a newtonian refractor, it is similar but much larger, almost to the edge of the FOV, and more distracting. I just checked my Orion 15x70's - no X, although more obvious CA.
Is this normal? Most of the time I won't be looking at the moon or streetlights, especially the streetlights, so I would assume this should not usually be a problem. I am still a little concerned with it though.
Is this something that is not evident on more expensive binos?
I appreciate your help.
Mike
I compared them to the Leupold Katmai 8x32's before I decided to buy them. I was ready to buy the Leupolds because they were smaller than the Nikons. (I will apologize now for not knowing the correct terms.) I was surprised that the Nikons seemed to show less curvature at the outer edge of the FOV (straight post) and appeared to be sharper farther out in the FOV.
So far so good.
Then I went out tonight to compare the Pentax to the Nikons. The Nikons showed a big X on all bright lights. It is evident on the moon and on street lights. The X had a greater angle on the top and bottom. It is really obvious. Then I noticed it on the Pentax also. The angle on the X on the Pentax is greater on the left and right, and about half or less the brightness of the Nikon X. If anyone has looked through a newtonian refractor, it is similar but much larger, almost to the edge of the FOV, and more distracting. I just checked my Orion 15x70's - no X, although more obvious CA.
Is this normal? Most of the time I won't be looking at the moon or streetlights, especially the streetlights, so I would assume this should not usually be a problem. I am still a little concerned with it though.
Is this something that is not evident on more expensive binos?
I appreciate your help.
Mike