• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

British Birds Feb 2009 (1 Viewer)

John Cantelo

Well-known member
Another interesting issue of 'BB' arrived this morning. The three main articles are on 'Birds and Habitat Change' (Part 2), Great Black-headed Gull and on the identification of Ehrenberg's Redstart (aka Phoenicurus phoenicurus amamisicus). Not read all of it yet, but plenty of meat there to get your teeth into!
 
Thanks John

In the February issue of British Birds:

Birds and habitat change in Britain. Part 2: past and future conservation responses
The second part of a major work on birds and habitat change in Britain, by Malcolm Ausden and Rob Fuller (part 1 was in the December 2008 issue). Since the middle of the 20th century, the conservation of bird habitats has developed enormously, in response to increasing habitat loss and deterioration. This papers looks at the history, successes, limitations and challenges of habitat conservation, and ends with a look to future approaches and thinking.

The social and communication behaviour of the Great Black-headed Gull
Based on studies at breeding colonies along the southeast shore of the Caspian Sea, Evgeniy Panov outlines the social behaviour and vocalisations of the Great Black-headed Gull. The paper highlights the unusual social organisation of this impressive species at breeding colonies, where intraspecific predation and infanticide are widespread. Aspects of signalling behaviour are also discussed in relation to the bird’s taxonomic position.

From the BBRC files: the identification of male Ehrenberg’s Redstart, with comments on British claims
The paper, by Brian Small on behalf of the Rarities Committee, looks at the identification of eastern Redstarts Phoenicurus phoenicurus samamisicus. The paper focuses on males, and explores the overlap between samamisicus and the nominate form of Common Redstart. Illustrated with many colour photographs, figures and sketches, this paper will be of particular interest to birders intrigued by the degree of variation in male Redstarts during last autumn’s bumper fall. This paper will form the basis for reviewing past claims and assessing current ones.

BB/BTO Best Bird Book of the Year
This year’s award went to The Migration Ecology of Birds, by Ian Newton, published by Academic Press

Letters, news & comment, announcements and recent reports complete the issue.

See the British Birds website at http://www.britishbirds.co.uk for full details of current and back issues, and to download a sample copy of BB.
 
Yea i already looked on that site,but I want to know if the mag is available other than online.

The magazine is not an online publication. As John stated.. 'his arrived this morning'. It's a great journal and full of info, as is Birding World.

Hope this helps.

John.
 
The magazine is not an online publication. As John stated.. 'his arrived this morning'. It's a great journal and full of info, as is Birding World.

Hope this helps.

John.

Oh i've not made myself clear. I know its a real publication but what i meant is would it be available in shops rather than having to sign up for an online subscription
 
It is a Subscription based Journal only, not available in the shops. Though saying that, I wonder why they don't have some copies 'on the shelf' at the RSPB shops.
 
It is a Subscription based Journal only, not available in the shops. Though saying that, I wonder why they don't have some copies 'on the shelf' at the RSPB shops.

Good question. Can't why printing enough extra copies to display at the right site won't cost too much and should bring in some revenue and new subscribers. Have subscribed for many years and although sometimes it can be hard going, often has articles on subject you wouldn't otherwise get to explore.
 
...rather than having to sign up for an online subscription
If you want to avoid subscribing 'online', you could instead write to:

Hazel Jenner (British Birds - Subscriptions & administration),
4 Harlequin Gardens, St Leonards on Sea, East Sussex TN37 7PF​

Richard
 
It is a Subscription based Journal only, not available in the shops. Though saying that, I wonder why they don't have some copies 'on the shelf' at the RSPB shops.

I don't want to get too birding political but the RSPB shops are not the right place for this journal (I won't get personal) plus production costs are high and BB can't afford to have that many spare copies gathering dust. I speak from a personal point of view and I do not represent BB. They may disagree with me.
 
If you want to avoid subscribing 'online', you could instead write to:

Hazel Jenner (British Birds - Subscriptions & administration),​

4 Harlequin Gardens, St Leonards on Sea, East Sussex TN37 7PF​
Richard
no I dont want a sub at all, would just like to get the magazine when I want it. Plus I couldnt afford the 49 quid sub fee.
 
I don't want to get too birding political but the RSPB shops are not the right place for this journal ........

I find this a very strange comment. Although the majority of RSPB members may not find 'BB' to their taste, many birders who would certainly find things of interest therein regularly visit RSPB reserves with shops (e.g. Dungeness). I'd agree that the economics of putting 'BB' in RSPB shops may be unsound, but I think it unwise to categorise either the 'BB' readership or RSPB members so narrowly,
 
RSPB and BB

I find this a very strange comment. Although the majority of RSPB members may not find 'BB' to their taste, many birders who would certainly find things of interest therein regularly visit RSPB reserves with shops (e.g. Dungeness). I'd agree that the economics of putting 'BB' in RSPB shops may be unsound, but I think it unwise to categorise either the 'BB' readership or RSPB members so narrowly,

Have to agree with you John. Titchwell stock Birding World, a similar publication, and why not? From the point of view of someone who has not been birding seriously all that long, putting BB or BW in RSPB shops opens your eyes to what is out there. The choice is yours whether you browse, buy or do neither, and choice is a great thing.

Cheers,
Jim.

ps Still havent read part 2 of the habitat report, better get on with it!
 
I find this a very strange comment. Although the majority of RSPB members may not find 'BB' to their taste, many birders who would certainly find things of interest therein regularly visit RSPB reserves with shops (e.g. Dungeness). I'd agree that the economics of putting 'BB' in RSPB shops may be unsound, but I think it unwise to categorise either the 'BB' readership or RSPB members so narrowly,

John, You know full well that to have copies of BB at RSPB reserves would be a waste of money.
 
Birding World

Titchwell stock Birding World, a similar publication, and why not?
On a recent birding tour, I was amused to hear a Dutch participant relate that Birding World is commonly regarded in the Netherlands as birding porn - lots of graphic pictures but little substance :eek!:

Richard
 
The choice is yours whether you browse, buy or do neither, and choice is a great thing.

Cheers,
Jim.

Choice may be a great thing but British Birds can't afford for browsers to do nothing, and at the same time, to have lots of copies gathering dust in some RSPB shop.
 
Last edited:
WRT counter sales at Titchwell Birding World has a sale or return policy. When I was at Baguette Bay it was tried and failed, just a right ol' p in the a to repackage 'em and send back each month. I suspect one of the editors can easily drop into Titchers once a month. BB simply can't afford this type of approach.

The following is facts are probably misquoted through rough memory of a talk I attended a few years back, but will give you an idea of what they're up against. BB suffered horribly under the old management regime coming close to closure at the start of the decade and having to be saved by small group setting up 'BB Ltd'. It has struggled to increase a circulation of what was (four/five years ago) in the region of 2-2,500.

Birding World was doing quite a bit better than this, but only about the 4-5,000 I was led to believe. It obviously gained readership from BB, taking a lot of the rarity oriented, being much more up to date, topical and opionated.

'Over the counter' mags were thought to be i.r.o. 9,000 pm for Birdwatch and 20,000 for Birdwatching. The latter had been as high as 23-24K but slipped back to about 17K when they had the audacity to cut down the number of pages dedicated to garden birding. This is why you suffer so much of the "ooo a jay on the bird table" guff, and similarly why there's yet another bino review and a 'wow look what's new in gortex' report. Oh, yeah, and the editor's just been on a holiday you can go on next year for three grand. They're like the ITV of the world. You want to be able to pick up at the shop, sure, you can, but you're going to have lots of ad breaks.

BB will continue to struggle against BW for rarity celebrity gossip, against Birdwatching for lack of lowbrow coverage and against Birdwatch for its slightly higher browed coverage of i.d., etc. IMO where it still excels is in trying to bring together national snapshots (rarity totals, scarcity totals, rare breeding bird totals, etc).

It is certainly the one of the four mentioned I find myself referring back to the most, and I would say if you haven't seen a recent copy, do get hold of one. I think NHBS has individual issues listed for sale, but I stand to be corrected.

(And while you're at it, you might want to try to get hold of BTO News. That's one magazine that always has something worth reading and worth keeping. Certainly worth a BTO subscription on its own.)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top