• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Great Sparrow (1 Viewer)

Alan Manson

KwaZulu-Natal birder
Opus Editor
Southern Rufous Sparrow

Discussion thread for Southern Rufous Sparrow. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.
--------------------

Passer motitensis:

S&M 96: Southern Rufous-Sparrow
H&M 03: Rufous Sparrow
Clements 07: Great Rufous Sparrow
IOC: Great Sparrow

Leave as Southern Rufous Sparrow until we get some consensus???

Because this is a southern African endemic, I favour the name used in all the local field guides, i.e. Great Sparrow
 
Last edited:
Just from curiosity: is it an extra large sparrow?

Looking for more authorities, Birdlife international uses Southern Rufous-Sparrow, which is rather strange; there is not another Rufous-Sparrow on their list.

I don't think it will be possible to find a really logical argument for anything. Great Rufous Sparrow would probably be my personal preference because it kind of tie together the different inputs, but I can also see the argument of choosing based on local field guides when there is absolutely no consensus among the authorities.

Niels
 
Just from curiosity: is it an extra large sparrow?

Nope, its not extra large; at 15-16 cm it is about the same size as the more common Cape Sparrow and Southern Grey-headed Sparrow. I think its just that it looks much the same (w.r.t. colour-pattern) as the House Sparrow, but is bigger - House Sparrow is 14-15.5 cm. However, they are best separated using colour of rump (grey in House, rufous in S Rufous).

I reckon that we just leave the name as is, and hope the lists come up with more consensus in time.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top