David,
Not yet convinced,too.The plumage on the "over sharpened"pic does look a bit more Little "Stintish",but that bill sets the alarm bells ringing.I still can't make out the head,legs and tail well enough to dismiss the Common Sandpiper.I still have a problem with all the vagrants that are being proposed and entertained as real options over the Common Sandpiper,when there have only been a handful of sightings of these species ever in the country.When a Little Stint,and if it's not, then it's this type of vagrant is proposed,I have a problem accepting that,because there should be an alarm going off in your head saying that's almost impossible.I'm sure that a lot of British birders would have a lot to say if I started seeing a possible Tree Swallow in a fuzzy photo of what appeared to be a Sand Martin,taken at some location in the UK.I'm sure that they would expect me to consider all the local swallows,swifts and Martins as more likely candidates and that they would wonder if I appreciated the situation if I said it's a Sand Martin,or if not,then probably a Tree Swallow.This bird is what appears to be a Common Sandpiper or a Little Stint.I favour the Common Sandpiper because of the bill.I'm very interested to hear what Trevor Hardaker says and if he's happy with that bill on a Little Stint,then I'll be covinced.