jogresh
Bimble and patch
The underparts certainly look like those of a Grey Wagtail so there seems to have been a bit of a mix up. Certainly one of the less than accurate illustrations!A wagtail was what came to my mind.
The underparts certainly look like those of a Grey Wagtail so there seems to have been a bit of a mix up. Certainly one of the less than accurate illustrations!A wagtail was what came to my mind.
Apparently, that is the only time in human history that that sentence has been written. ;-)And out of the anus some swifts?
Beeing an well-known painting in artists circles, I assumed that some people have asked the question about ID of the birds before:
Please note, that Bosch used many species that represent attributes/characters understood by people of that time (I am no expert in this, so if this of deeper interest, others should jump in)The birds in The Garden of Earthly Delights |
We invite you to birdwatch in The Garden of Earthly Delights, the masterpiece of Hieronymus Boschbirding140.com
Tom, it was painted betwenn 1490 and 1500.
A pretty decent depiction of an Oilbird to me which is also known as the Devil bird.Hi all: I'm writing a monograph on the above painting. In the right panel (Hell) there is a predator bird sitting on his - let's call it a throne. He is devouring a horizontal man. Any idea what that bird is? Or what it is most like?
Your expert opinion will be highly valued.
Many thx!
Bosch died in 1516 so the work pre-dates that. It may even be pre-Columbus.A pretty decent depiction of an Oilbird to me which is also known as the Devil bird.
Christopher Columbus landed on Trinidad (where there are Oilbirds) in 1498.Bosch died in 1516 so the work pre-dates that. It may even be pre-Columbus.
Was Bosch with himChristopher Columbus landed on Trinidad (where there are Oilbirds) in 1498.
Well he had up to 18 years to get his hands on a specimen, you don't think it looks like an Oilbird clearly?Was Bosch with him![]()
Well he had up to 18 years to get his hands on a specimen, you don't think it looks like an Oilbird clearly?
Art critics say this is a shrike but I though the beak was too long for that . . . ?
Post 4 contains a more definite Hoopoe, (behind the Kingfisher), so he would have known what that was like.could be based on Hoopoe?