• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Can anyone identify these (2 Viewers)

Thanks. But we are lucky here to have lots of redshank on our shore and I know them well. These were so different in their looks and their attitude that they stood out. Especially the black masks covering their faces which perhaps don't stand out well in the photos. But thanks anyway.
 
So different in their looks and attitude that when photographed they look just like redshank? What else do you suppose they might be? They appear to be waders with white underparts and dark upperparts as well as a straight bill which is about 1.5 times the length of the head (exactly like a redshank). Their posture is typical of a swimming redshank, with neck extended and a high rear end. It's pretty hard to draw any other conclusion other than that they are indeed redshank. Excluding things like breeding plumaged plovers, no UK wader has a black mask covering its face, which means this is likely to have been an artefact of lighting or mud staining.
 
With all due respect these were not redshank, I've seen enough redshank and know them well. There were a group of 4 walking several paces ahead of me on the beach, very friendly. When I stopped they stopped, when I walked on they walked on. This happened for several minutes before they finally walked into the sea and swam off. They were shades of grey and white with black faces, with a dark bill, no brown at all, no orange legs and no orange bill. So they didn't look like redshank or act like redshank, which would have flown away screaming the minute they saw you.


I have been in touch with a former RSPB warden, who was the RSPB warden for the Orkney Islands for many years and knew the birds there intimately. She says these were “definitely” red-knecked phalarope, not even suspect grey phalarope. She was surprised herself. Strange but there we are.
 

Attachments

  • Bird 01.jpg
    Bird 01.jpg
    212.6 KB · Views: 36
I have been in touch with a former RSPB warden, who was the RSPB warden for the Orkney Islands for many years and knew the birds there intimately. She says these were “definitely” red-knecked phalarope, not even suspect grey phalarope. She was surprised herself. Strange but there we are.
Phalaropes actually don't look much like this. Apart from the pattern, their bills would be shorter and more needle-like. These are common redshanks as everyone has said.
 
She says these were “definitely” red-knecked phalarope, not even suspect grey phalarope.
Sorry, but in my humble opinion she is wrong. In my view the birds are not Red-necked Phalarope (and I am sorry to say, I agree with the Redshank ID). I have seen many Red-necked Phalarope as I used to live in Hong Kong and Guangdong, where they are a relatively common passage migrant. The plumage is wrong - Red-necked Phalarope in winter plumage is rather pale grey and white, with a black hind crown and mask that contrasts strongly with the white face - not at all like the birds in the photos. In summer plumage the birds have pale fringes to back feathers, with a thicker buffy line along the edge of the mantle, the lower throat and neck sides are rufous (even in the duller males), contrasting with a white throat. The bill is also needle like in Red-necked Phalarope, straight and proportionately shorter than the birds in the photos, which show too heavy a bill.

We can then add in the fact that Red-necked Phalarope winters along way away - European birds have been GPS tracked to the Pacific off Peru. They are quite late migrants, so to get birds in Britain in early April would would be remarkable, and as far as I am aware unheard of.
 
Found this on the British Trust for Ornithology ‘BirdTrack’ website relating to Red-necked Phalarope.

1743700931250.png
Weekly occurrence patterns (shaded cells) and reporting rates (vertical bars) based on BirdTrack data. Reporting rates give the likelihood of encountering the species each week.

There are apparently 6.5k records in their database - and apparently not one in April.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top