• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Downy feather fossils from the Zhonggou Formation (1 Viewer)

albertonykus

Well-known member
Zhang, J., B. Du, S. Lin, J. Peng, A. Li, M. Zhang, G. Ma, J. Hui, D. Jiaoba, and G. Liu (2023)
Downy feather fossils from the Lower Cretaceous of the Jiuquan Basin, Gansu Province, Northwest China
Cretaceous Research (advance online publication)
doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105653

Mesozoic feather fossils are well known for their exceptional preservation. However, the scarcity of quantities and the lack of fine structural details preserved in carbonaceous fossils, most studies have focused on the macro-morphology of such feather fossils, neglecting the significance of the microscopic morphology. A group of 28 downy feather fossils preserved in the Lower Cretaceous strata of the Jiuquan Basin are similar to the modern feather, including basic structures such as calamus, barb, and barbules, and are considered to be early downy feathers. Based on well-preserved and quantified feather characteristics, multivariate statistical analysis (PCA and CVA) was used to compare fossil groups with modern down feathers. The results revealed that the microscopic morphology of fossil feathers was noticeably different from living birds, that feathers from the Early Cretaceous may not yet be true down feathers, and that the species specificity between different specimens within the fossil taxa suggests that they may have come from different coelurosaurs. This gives us further information about the evolution of Early Cretaceous feathers.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top