A bird does not need to be an escape not to be admitted to Category A. It simply needs a reasonable doubt that it has occurred naturally ie in an unassisted fashion (subject to the nuance on ship assistance). Difficult coherently to argue that with the range & proven records of this species & the condition of the bird, that there was not a reasonable doubt as properly understood. Some work was done by the Committee to evaluate extralimital records in the Middle East.
That said, we are probably only a couple of Committee reshuffles off the lines being blurred & in the absence of coherent documentation as to the barrier to acceptance, I would not bet against acceptance with no further evidence!
If this was actually a wild unassisted vagrant, we can expect additional records to lead to a re-evaluation.
Paper on Paddyfield Pipit attached. A good article.
All the best
Paul