• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Phylloscopidae (4 Viewers)

Wu, L., J. Dang, L. Tang, Y. Cheng, G. Song, Y. Sun, J. Martens, M. Päckert, P. Alström, D. Zhang, C. Jia, and F. Lei (2023)
Limited song-mixing without genomic gene flow in a contact zone between two songbird species
Molecular Biology and Evolution (advance online publication)
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad053

Song is considered to play an important role in the maintenance of prezygotic reproductive isolation between closely related songbird species. Therefore, song-mixing in a contact zone between closely related species is often considered as evidence of hybridization. The Sichuan Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus forresti and the Gansu Leaf Warbler P. kansuensis, which diverged two million years ago, have formed a contact zone in the south of the Gansu Province of China, where mixed-songs have been observed. In this study, we investigated the potential causes and consequences of song-mixing by integrating bioacoustic, morphological, mitochondrial, and genomic data with field ecological observations. We found that the two species display no apparent morphological differences, while their songs differ dramatically. We demonstrated that approximately 11% of the males in the contact zone sang mixed-songs. Two males singing mixed-song were genotyped, and both were found to be P. kansuensis. Despite the presence of mixed-singers, population genomic analyses detected no signs of recent gene flow between the two species, although two possible cases of mitochondrial introgression were identified. We conclude that the rather limited song-mixing does not lead to, or result from, hybridization, and hence does not result in the breakdown of reproductive barriers between these cryptic species.
 
Acanthopneuste floris (Hartert, E, 1898) OD v. 5 (1898) - Novitates zoologicae - Biodiversity Heritage Library

Sorry I do not get the story of Acanthopneuste floris (Hartert, E, 1898). Some souces tells us it is a subspecies of Phylloscopus presbytes e.g. Timor Leaf Warbler - Phylloscopus presbytes - Birds of the World . According Phylloscopus floresianus (floris) (Flores Leaf-Warbler (syn. floris)) - Avibase it is a junior synonym of Phylloscopus floresianus (Dickinson & Christidis, 2014) and Bushtits, leaf warblers, reed warblers – IOC World Bird List do not list the name at all.

Especially the synonym makes no sense to me. Wouldn't Hartert have priority?

 
Acanthopneuste floris (Hartert, E, 1898) OD v. 5 (1898) - Novitates zoologicae - Biodiversity Heritage Library

Sorry I do not get the story of Acanthopneuste floris (Hartert, E, 1898). Some souces tells us it is a subspecies of Phylloscopus presbytes e.g. Timor Leaf Warbler - Phylloscopus presbytes - Birds of the World . According Phylloscopus floresianus (floris) (Flores Leaf-Warbler (syn. floris)) - Avibase it is a junior synonym of Phylloscopus floresianus (Dickinson & Christidis, 2014) and Bushtits, leaf warblers, reed warblers – IOC World Bird List do not list the name at all.

Especially the synonym makes no sense to me. Wouldn't Hartert have priority?
H&M4 says:
The name Seicercus presbytes floresianus is a nomen novum for Acanthopneuste floris Hartert, 1898 which, in Seicercus, is preoccupied by Cryptolopha montis floris Hartert, 1897.
 
On the taxonomic status of the Siberian Chiffchaff Phylloscopus [collybita] tristis (Phylloscopidae)
PAUL DONIOL-VALCROZE



No abstract but free pdf
It doesn't look like it has any new information, just a review of prior publications, but I agree that if Iberian Chiffchaff is considered a separate species, then so should Siberian.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top