• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Pipit, raptor and nightjar form Shaffa, Saudi Arabia. (2 Viewers)

ammadoux

Registered doux
Hello all
just got back form two day trip in Shaffa mountain near Taif, got some lovely sighting of many Arabian endemics which are so easy to ID, but got also these three, please help, thanks so much.
 

Attachments

  • _4260463_DxO.jpg
    _4260463_DxO.jpg
    4.9 MB · Views: 110
  • _4260834_DxO.jpg
    _4260834_DxO.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 106
  • _4261082_DxO.jpg
    17 MB · Views: 66
  • _4261084_DxO.jpg
    17.3 MB · Views: 55
I agree on adult male Shikra for no. 2.
However, I have some difficulties with no. 1 being a Long-billed Pipit although colours seem to favour that species (greyish upperparts, darkish buff underparts). Its supercilium is rather short, broad and abrupt ending, bill is rather short and not at all 'hooked' at tip (or with downcurved upper mandible), so I'm a bit on the fence between Tawny and Long-billed here. But I don't have experience with Long-billed Pipit, so, could well be wrong. Could you please tell, what makes you feel certain about LBP, Grahame?
Can't ID the nightjar.
 
I agree on adult male Shikra for no. 2.
However, I have some difficulties with no. 1 being a Long-billed Pipit although colours seem to favour that species (greyish upperparts, darkish buff underparts). Its supercilium is rather short, broad and abrupt ending, bill is rather short and not at all 'hooked' at tip (or with downcurved upper mandible), so I'm a bit on the fence between Tawny and Long-billed here. But I don't have experience with Long-billed Pipit, so, could well be wrong. Could you please tell, what makes you feel certain about LBP, Grahame?
Can't ID the nightjar.
Well without access to pipits book, and just based on photos...

reluctantly agree long-billed (initially thought possibly African: doesn't have what I'd call a long bill...). Not tawny, because (e.g.): pattern of malar, submoustachial etc poorly developed (usually strong, clear in tawny); ground colour is greyish not tawny; buff fringes to flight feathers are thin not thick; breast streaking is quite extensive (often missing, faint on tawny).
 
I agree on adult male Shikra for no. 2.
However, I have some difficulties with no. 1 being a Long-billed Pipit although colours seem to favour that species (greyish upperparts, darkish buff underparts). Its supercilium is rather short, broad and abrupt ending, bill is rather short and not at all 'hooked' at tip (or with downcurved upper mandible), so I'm a bit on the fence between Tawny and Long-billed here. But I don't have experience with Long-billed Pipit, so, could well be wrong. Could you please tell, what makes you feel certain about LBP, Grahame?
Can't ID the nightjar.
Tawny Pipit should have smaller and well-defined dark centres to median coverts; LBP has these broader and more diffuse.
I don't know anything about African though.
 
I agree on adult male Shikra for no. 2.
However, I have some difficulties with no. 1 being a Long-billed Pipit although colours seem to favour that species (greyish upperparts, darkish buff underparts). Its supercilium is rather short, broad and abrupt ending, bill is rather short and not at all 'hooked' at tip (or with downcurved upper mandible), so I'm a bit on the fence between Tawny and Long-billed here. But I don't have experience with Long-billed Pipit, so, could well be wrong. Could you please tell, what makes you feel certain about LBP, Grahame?
Can't ID the nightjar.
Lou, I shall address your main concern regarding the supercilium appearing 'cut-off'', suspect its due to overlaying crown feathers, there is a paler continuation beyond the apparent 'break', the supercilium can be seen to be long and downcurved. With regards bill length, probably at the short end of range but maybe due in part to foreshortening, the head turned very slightly to the left. In all other respects it looks a typical Long-billed, the key differences already explained, presumably ssp. arabicus in Saudi Arabia.

Grahame
 
Last edited:
in Jeddah the resident breeding is the Nubian, Egyptian and European are visitors either passage or not sure if the Egyptian is breeding Spring visitor.
Two things about that: you wrote that the photo was not from Jeddah but from "Shaffa mountain near Taif". Secondly, please see part of the range of Montane Nightjar from Birds of the World in the snip below; I circled the area on the Arabian Peninsula occupied by this species.
Niels
1745937990125.png
 
Lou, I shall address your main concern regarding the supercilium appearing 'cut-off'', suspect its due to overlaying crown feathers, there is a paler continuation beyond the apparent 'break', the supercilium can be seen to be long and downcurved. With regards bill length, probably at the short end of range but maybe due in part to foreshortening, the head turned very slightly to the left. In all other respects it looks a typical Long-billed, the key differences already explained, presumably ssp. arabicus in Saudi Arabia.

Grahame
Thank you. I had actually seen that particular continuation but wasn't sure it was part of the supercilium.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top