• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Pipit UK - prob strongly marked Meadow (1 Viewer)

Mole1

Well-known member
Had this interesting pipit recently in the UK. It didn't call (or possibly did and called as Meadow - was in a small flock and only Meadow flight call heard). Was attracted originally by seeing a photo from my wife showing what looked like streaking on the rump.

I managed some better photos of it the following day and from what I can see it is either a strongly marked Meadow Pipit (most likely), or poorly marked Red-Throated. Some of my own comments:
- Streaking on upper tail coverts looks more marked from the side than behind
- Streaking seems to extend to lower rump, although perhaps better described as spotted on rump when seen from behind
- Well defined supercilium - not typical of the meadows I have been scrutinising recently
- Paler bird - stood out noticeably, particularly front on with bold dark streaks on pale breast
- Flank streaking is poorly defined (pro Meadow feature)
- Mantle shows tramlines, but not as well defined as you would expect for a classic Red-Throated.
- shortest tertial looks closest to Meadow pattern. Contrast on wing does not stand out enough to me for Red-Throated

So where have I got to in my analysis? I think probably meadow, but there is something about this bird that means that I don't want to assign it to the scrap heap without getting the opinion of others. I've certainly learned a lot about pipits from reading a few articles, particularly that Meadows can show streaking/ spotting on Uppertail coverts and rump. Lots of photos attached - probably across a few posts.

Thanks in advance for considering this bird and providing comments.
 

Attachments

  • MP04.JPG
    MP04.JPG
    374.7 KB · Views: 132
  • MP07.JPG
    MP07.JPG
    339.6 KB · Views: 84
  • MP08.JPG
    MP08.JPG
    277.5 KB · Views: 62
  • MP11.JPG
    MP11.JPG
    375.1 KB · Views: 77
  • MP12.JPG
    MP12.JPG
    334 KB · Views: 93
More photos
 

Attachments

  • MP16.JPG
    MP16.JPG
    379.7 KB · Views: 43
  • MP17.JPG
    MP17.JPG
    378 KB · Views: 57
  • MP29.JPG
    MP29.JPG
    388.6 KB · Views: 76
  • MP34.JPG
    MP34.JPG
    408.7 KB · Views: 39
  • MP40.JPG
    MP40.JPG
    387.5 KB · Views: 35
Final few shots
 

Attachments

  • MP43.JPG
    MP43.JPG
    366.9 KB · Views: 40
  • MP46.JPG
    MP46.JPG
    354.3 KB · Views: 60
  • MP47.JPG
    MP47.JPG
    380.2 KB · Views: 42
I notice the lack of comments, and understand what you're saying. But I can't see this bird as anything other than a Mipit. They are so notoriously variable! I can see the link to 1stW RTP, but, having seen so many variable Mipits over the years? I can't see another pipit ID here. Best of luck with others' input...
 
You call that well marked, look at this from Russia last year!

I assume this is a Mipit?

Andy
 

Attachments

  • 1 (1 of 1) (2).jpg
    1 (1 of 1) (2).jpg
    532.9 KB · Views: 148
Agree with Mipit. You can just make out the rufous tone to the uppertail coverts in #3 and, IMO, the "mantle braces" aren't clear / sharp enough and the eyering is too bold for 1st W RtP.
 
Sorry to hijack, but I was about to post a thread with an identical title. Photos below taken on Friday in North Devon, UK on salt marsh.

Surely just a Mipit, but I'm not sure I've seen such a strongly marked breast and flank before. At first glance I thought it was a Rock pipit, but clearly not. Only got these two blurry (unfortunately) shots before it offski'd.

Mick
 

Attachments

  • Nov15 Pipit 01.JPG
    Nov15 Pipit 01.JPG
    772.6 KB · Views: 74
  • Nov15 Pipit 02.JPG
    Nov15 Pipit 02.JPG
    773.2 KB · Views: 48
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top