• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Report that climate change threatens birds seems like a publicity stunt (1 Viewer)

You completely miss the point.

The cause is irrelevant.

The fact is this: Every bird species alive today survived these sudden and dramatic climate changes in the past. Surely, the slight rise in temperatures in the future will not be the reason for future extinctions.

In the past there were less people and the ability for birds to find suitable habitat would have been a lot easier. They can fly you know?
These days there are not so many options available for them and a lot are killed for fun in some places. Food sources i.e. fish stocks are declining as well.
In prehistoric times who actually did bird surveys? So who knows what effects the climate had on all species? The fossil record of any time can't give a complete picture.
 
Bird populations and wildlife are declining rapidly. People are looking for the smoking gun. The one thing that is certain is the human population is increasing and this is stressing the natural world. We humans not only introduce pollutants in the environment but you use the term “natural resource” as an excuse to exterminate populations. The insect biomass is free fall in certain areas and hence the bird populations too. There is new evidence that the use of systemic pesticides is linked to the Bee die off. In the United States, neonicotinoids, a systemic class of pesticides, “coat a massive 142 million acres of corn, wheat, soy and cotton seeds. They are also a common ingredient in home gardening products.” These pesticides are of a particular concern because they kill sucking and chewing insects by disrupting their nervous system. Furthermore, “unlike older pesticides that evaporate or disperse shortly after application, neonicotinoids are systemic poisons. Applied to the soil or doused on seeds, neonicotinoid insecticides incorporate themselves into the plant’s tissues, turning the plant itself into a tiny poison factory emitting toxin from its roots, leaves, stems, pollen, and nectar.” In the one study, a research team at the University of Sterling, U.K., exposed bumble bees to field-realistic levels of the neonicotinoid imidacloprid, a clothianidin predecessor, then allowed them to develop naturally under field conditions. The researches found that “treated colonies had a significantly reduced growth rate and suffered an 85% reduction in production of new queens compared to control colonies.” They concluded that the “impacts of imidacloprid on reproduction of wild bumble bee colonies are likely to be widespread and significant, particularly as this chemical is registered for use on over 140 crops in over 120 countries” and suggested that there “is an urgent need to develop alternatives to the widespread use of neonicotinoid pesticides on flowering crops wherever possible.” These chemicals could therefore be effect insect populations in general and hence the bird populations that feed on them….
Man is messing with nature and nature will have her say… ultimately effecting the carrying capacity of the earth.

Richard
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top