Pale lores = Marsh sand indeed, looks like a bird in transitional plumage to me.Thanks Andy, sure not a Marsh Sandpiper?
. . . which have a shorter bill than the OP's.See similar birds below
Just to note: Macauley shows that greenshank usually has a clearly longer bill. However, there's overlap and some greenshanks have [relatively] shorter bills than marsh sands. Ditto thickness. Marsh Sandpiper Macaulay Library ML373861071 is a good example of this: bill is thicker than you might expect [assuming we think it's correctly identified].. . . which have a shorter bill than the OP's.
Yes but you can find images of marsh sand which look similar. If very pronounced, then it's greenshank. Otherwise, it might be an extreme marsh individual. I'm unclear about this particular image.The bill of the Common Greenshank is slightly up-turned.
BirdLife Bendigo-Echuca AGM and End of Year Function | BirdLife Australia
BirdLife Australia is dedicated to creating a bright future for Australia's birds.www.birdlife.org.au
The page contains a description which perfectly supports my first idea when I saw these two pictures. Everything about its beak is to me Greenshank (shape,tip, colour). Hope my view does not confuse you.Yes but you can find images of marsh sand which look similar. If very pronounced, then it's greenshank. Otherwise, it might be an extreme marsh individual. I'm unclear about this particular image.
Almost certainly, but I'm unconvinced you can safely estimate it from these pics (had a visual try with Macaulay). See notes about bill feathering above tooI was wondering about the leg length, I expect there would be a formula comparing tibia length to body length or something (where's Jane Turner these days?!)