• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Swarovski Binoculars - Volume of Production (1 Viewer)

John A Roberts

Well-known member
Australia
Jan has posted about the relative popularity of the three new NL models in terms of sales in his shop
The breakdown is perhaps somewhat surprisingly, around 60% for the 12x42, 30% for the 10x42, and 10% for the 8x42
see post #14 at: https://www.birdforum.net/threads/swarovski-nl-pure-10x42-are-there-supply-issues.406230/

This prompted me to revisit something that I’ve thought about before. The serial number information that I’ve collected
makes it possible to look at the production/ popularity of the various Swarovski binocular lines over time
Although it doesn’t give the same degree of detail as Jan’s experience, I think that it will be of some interest to many

Notwithstanding that Swarovski doesn’t formally publish detailed information about sales (and nor does Zeiss or Leica),
the particular combination of Swarovski’s serial numbering, along with the use of the Internet to view sales listings, makes the following possible

- - - -
While doing so may not endear me to some at Swarovski (so I won’t be surprised if I don’t receive a Christmas basket!),
posting the information doesn’t put Swarovski at any real comparative disadvantage, especially in relation to Zeiss and Leica
e.g. in many locations Swarovski is the most popular of the three in terms of binocular sales

Additionally, I imagine that all three already informally collect information about relative sales by various means,
including having their sales representatives discuss the topic with larger retailers


Serial Number Construction
As many will be aware, with the serial numbering that was used until September last year:
• the prefix letter indicated the product line or product type
• the first 2 numerals the year of production (add 1930)
• the next 2 numerals the week of production (from 01 to 52), and
• the last 5 numerals were a consecutive serial number (within a 10,000 unit range)


Recent Yearly Production (in thousands of units)
EL x50 - c2.5k (D8839 40387 to D8935 42860 - so from September 2018 to August 2019)
EL x42 - c11.3k (K8837 48490 to K9036 49782) *
EL x32 - c4k (F8816 46281 to F8910 40146) *

SLC x56 - c2.8k (N8841 48935 to N8937 42811) *
SLC x42 - c5.7k (C8904 40861 to C9004 46583)

CL x30 - c6.6k (K8913 54064 to K9009 50525) *
CL x25 - c9k (G8917 57157 to G9027 56892) *

EL Range - c8k (T8903 67270 to T9004 65209) *

Habicht - c2k (A8906 17252 to A9010 19350) **

For a total of 50k+


* the consecutive numbering reset when the limit of the number block was reached e.g. the EL’s numbering ran from 40000 to 49999
** comprises all of the CF models: 8x30, 7x42 and 10x40, in both leatherette and RA


Limitations
The above is the most recent data that I’ve collected. So it’s necessarily about past - but relatively recent - production
The 12 month periods don’t exactly coincide, though they do largely overlap; the range being from early 2018 to mid 2019
And as not all the periods are precisely 12 months, I’ve sometimes rounded slightly up or down


Some Observations
In terms of current offerings, the above predates:
• the introduction of the dG monocular and the NL x42 binocular line
• the updated versions of the CL x25 and the El Range TA, and
• the discontinuation of the SLC x42

The demand for models eventually wanes over time. So sales will change in both absolute and relative terms for earlier and later periods in a production cycle

Knowing unit sales, doesn’t give any idea of unit profitability e.g. in US dollars:
• the $2k EL x32 compared to the $1.1k CL x30, or
• the effect of the set up and teething costs associated with initially producing the newly released $3k NL x42, compared to producing the long established $2.1k EL x42 (now the modified Legend version), and compared to producing the much longer established $1.2k Habicht (the RA 10x40 being the most expensive in the line)

And in considering Swarovski’s production capacity, besides hand-held optics they also manufacture comprehensive lines of both telescopes and telescopic sights


John
 
Last edited:

tenex

reality-based
Thanks, John. Interesting: SLC 56 may outsell EL 50. SLC 42 was quite popular, yet now discontinued. EL 42 was #1, yet now downgraded. CL 25 was #2, more popular than CL 30. The Range line was #3; hunters are clearly underrepresented in my acquaintance.
 

John A Roberts

Well-known member
Australia
Hi tenex,

I think that one of the things that the data makes obvious is that a replacement for the SLC x42 should be expected very soon
While the SLC had declined in popularity over time, it was still over 10% of the total production
So one would expect a substantial bump in demand for a new model with attractive features, specifications and pricing: a CL x40/ 42?

Interestingly, Kahles has recently pushed back the relaunch of the SLC x42 (as the Helia S) to June, see post #8 at:
So an indication to expect a new model from Swarovski before then?

And I too was surprised at the popularity of the EL Range (pre-TA version). Particularly when taking into account:
it's age, dating from 2010, and; that it lacked the data transfer capabilities of the more recent Zeiss and Leica alternatives


John
 
Last edited:

John A Roberts

Well-known member
Australia
One way to consider the production numbers is in relation to retail prices, as shown in the attached table

The table shows four broad groupings:
A) 20% (10.5k) at $3,000+/- (mainly the EL Range x42, plus the EL x50)

B) 35% (18.1k) at $2,200+/- (mainly the EL x42, plus the EL x32, and also the SLC x56)

C) 11% (5.7k) at $1,600 (the SLC x42)

D) 34% (17.6k) at $1,000+/- (mainly the CL x25, plus the CL x30, and also the Habicht line)


The upgraded EL Range TA, and especially the new NL, will add to the high end A) level sales
And the specialised dG should add somewhat to the B) level

A 'CL x40' would fill the gap at the C) level, left by the discontinuation of the SLC x42
Though the exact pricing would presumedly need to carefully factor in various considerations,
especially when compared to Leica and Zeiss offerings


John
 

Attachments

  • Retail Pricing.jpg
    Retail Pricing.jpg
    228.9 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:

etudiant

Registered User
Supporter
One way to consider the production numbers is in relation to retail prices, as in the attached table

It shows four broad groupings:
A) 20% (10.5k) at $3,000+/- (mainly the EL Range x42, plus the EL x50)

B) 35% (18.1k) at $2,200+/- (mainly the EL x42, plus the EL x32, and the SLC x56)

C) 11% (5.7k) at $1,600 (the SLC x42)

D) 34% (17.6k) at $1,000+/- (mainly the CL x25, plus the CL x30, and the Habicht)


The upgraded EL Range TA, and especially the new NL, will both add to the high end A) level sales
And the specialised dG should add somewhat to the B) level

A 'CL x40' would fill the gap at the C) level, left by the discontinuation of the SLC x42
Though the exact pricing would presumedly need to carefully factor in various considerations,
especially when compared to Leica and Zeiss offerings


John
Thank you for this serious contribution to our understanding of the binocular business.
The volumes involved, a few tens of thousands, compare to the annual million plus DSLR production by the Canons, Nikons and Sonys.
So a small niche market, with multiple competitors.
Kudos to Swarovski, they have achieved market leadership in a difficult space.
 

Yeti Man

Out there !
United States
Interestingly, Kahles has recently pushed back the relaunch of the SLC x42 (as the Helia S) to June, see post #8 at:
So an indication to expect a new model from Swarovski before then?
Hopefully the response from buyers will reflect the new name, which to me reads as "H#ll Yes" !
 

John A Roberts

Well-known member
Australia
Other Swarovski Production

Swarovski has 3 main lines of commercial production; handheld optics, telescopes and telescopic sights
I’ve collected less serial number data about the telescopes and even less about the sights

However, after doing some comparisons across data from recent years, my best estimate is that current annual production would be:
• at least 30,000 telescopes (including the serial numbered eyepieces, camera adapters and the ME extender for the X series), and
• at least 50,000 sights

So the total of Swarovski's own commercial production is at the very least 130,000 units per year - and most likely significantly more

- - - -
The qualification 'own commercial production' is because under the Swarotec brand, Swarovski provides a variety of services to other companies *
To quote from the 2016 Sustainability Report:
'Swarotec, a division of Swarovski Optik, specialises in the development and manufacture of custom system solutions for applications used by industrial customers. These include, for example, high-resolution imaging systems, laser-measuring modules or display integration in optical products, which are used in industrial image processing, medical and ophthalmological devices, long-range optical instruments, and automated production systems with optical process control.' **

The extent of what Swarotec does, especially for industrial clients, is of course unknown
However, two known products are:
• the glass in starMed’s SV iMag line of binocular loupes for dental use, and
• the coated achromats in Sure-Loc’s Black Eagle line of archery sights
(see the attached images)

And as previously indicated, the new Kahles Helia S binocular (the recently discontinued Swarovski x42 SLC), is due later this year
As to whether it'll be manufactured by Kahles, or perhaps assembled by them using Swarovski manufactured components, is unclear
See post #1 at: https://www.birdforum.net/threads/new-kahles-helia-s-8x42-and-10x42-models.403874/


* the Swarotec site is at: https://www.swarotec.com/en.html

** for some examples of the variety of information in the 136 page Swarovski Optik Sustainability Report, along with the current address for it
(it's included in the most recent post), see: https://www.birdforum.net/threads/swarovski-optik’s-2016-sustainability-report.373270/


John
 

Attachments

  • starMed SV iMag.jpg
    starMed SV iMag.jpg
    257.2 KB · Views: 14
  • Sure-Loc Black Eagle.jpg
    Sure-Loc Black Eagle.jpg
    392.1 KB · Views: 12
Last edited:

John A Roberts

Well-known member
Australia
For some indication of Swarovski's ongoing capability, the following information was recently posted elsewhere:
First the NLPure 42mm, then the EL Range TA, now the 32’s, very impressive having replaced the top of their line in eight months in all but the 50’s.
Part of the reason that this is possible, is due to Swarovski completing a building programme at Absam, in the fall of last year
The construction took well over 2 years at a cost €27 million, and comprises both a new production building and a new administrative one

The production building which is intended to meet future demand '. . . hous(es) a cutting-edge anodization plant for aluminum surface finishing,
facilities for optical component production and device assembly, as well as a technical center.'

For more details and some exterior images see: https://www.swarovskioptik.com/int/...e-new-administration-and-production-buildings


John
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top