• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

The CBR Checklist of Birds of China v3.0 (2013) (1 Viewer)

metroplex

Wei Qian
Dear everyone,

The latest version (v3.0) of the CBR Checklist of Birds of China is available online now.

In this version, we implemented several changes:

1. Taxonomy and nomenclature was updated based on the IOC World Bird Names List v3.5;

2. Recent new records of birds in China were added into the current version;

3. The IUCN Red List category was updated for each species;

4. Listed the remarks about the differences compared to " A Field Guide to the Birds of China".

We still appreciate for any comment and suggestion anytime.

The list is available at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ahb94xisyandb9k/中国鸟类名录v3.0_1231.pdf

or

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwLbmLpGzCPuNVZiSFVpZnR4c1k/edit?usp=sharing



Wei Qian ([email protected])
2013-12-31
 
Elachuridae

It will be interesting to know more about the family Elachuridae.
Google Translate: "(135) Lixing Wren Babbler Elachura formosus by the Babbler as a separate branch Timaliidae Star Wren Babbler single type Cory Division Elachuridae". ???

Collar & Robson 2007 (HBW 12) treats Spelaeornis formosus as Elachura formosa.

John Boyd (TiF) also tentatively moves Spelaeornis caudatus and S badeigularis to Elachura (in Pnoepygidae).
 
Last edited:
"Elachura formosa" Thanks for posting this Richard I was wondering about this. Bird started out as Troglodytes punctatus Blyth,1845 but their was something wrong with this so Walden/Tweeddale changed it to T. formosus in 1874. Stuart Baker put it in Elachura in 1930 and had it as E. formosa. Elachura dates from 1889 by Oates. Pnoepyga is Hodgson 1844 from Gray's Zoological Miscellany but all these names are nomen nudem . Hodgson properly describes Pnoepyga in 1845 PZS. But is that name available?
 
Last edited:
not just a new family by the looks, maybe also a monotypic superfamily (can such a thing exist?) "elachuroidea"! (hope i'm not accused of taxonomic vandalism there!)

does anyone know whether the basal passerida as described by John Boyd (wattlebirds, australasian robins etc.) were included in this analysis as they don't seem to be covered by any of the clades?

James
 
does anyone know whether the basal passerida as described by John Boyd (wattlebirds, australasian robins etc.) were included in this analysis as they don't seem to be covered by any of the clades?

looking at the paper chaetopidae is treated as an outgroup so "passerida" as used is equivalent to "core passerida" as used by John Boyd.

figure 2 also a reminder of just how special crests/kinglets are also..

James
 
Note that the Muscicapoidea group (Muscicapoidea/Certhioidea/Bombycilloidea/Elachuridae) and the Sylvioidea group (Sylvioidea/Paroidea/Stenostiridae/Hyliotidae) are sisters, with the Reguloidea sister to them and the Passeroidea sister to the whole thing, although none of these relationships are strongly supported. But should additional studies show this to be correct, that would mean that the Passeroidea would no longer be listed last on the checklist (at least for those of us who like to list the smallest clades first).
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top