l_raty
laurent raty
"Berlin, bei ihm".Oh, Ok that wasn't the one I was looking for. I was looking for the one below the evangelischer Religion. But notthat important anymore from my prospective.
"Berlin, bei ihm".Oh, Ok that wasn't the one I was looking for. I was looking for the one below the evangelischer Religion. But notthat important anymore from my prospective.
In the 1894 Adreßbuch, they are both there -- the Lehrer on Prenzlauer Allee and, two lines below him, the Rentier on Köpenickerstr.(same?)
Attached is August's birth record from Polkau u Polkritz in Saxony-Anhalt. This location makes sense as his father was a professional Jäger.
This would mean that he is unlikely to be the brother of the Karl Wilhelm Streubel (1816 - 1868) born in Leipzig contra several family tree websites. He probably did have a brother called Karl but I am not sure where he was born.
Attached also is a death certificate for a Dr. Lehrer August Streubel for 8 April 1895. N Prenzlauer Allee (His last address) and Niederschönhausen (where the death is registered) are nearby and both in the Pankow area of Berlin today.
P
This seems to be a reprint. Here as Anleitung Naturalien aller Reiche zu sammeln und für wissenschaftliche Zwecke, wie auch zum Vergnügen aufzustellen. Ein Hülfsbuch für Lehrer und zum Selbstunterricht. Available in Erlangen here.
Anyway here Cypselus Streubelii Harlaub, 1861. It is a new name for Cypselus abessynicus Streubel, 1848. The article is Die Cypseliden des Berliner Museums pp. 348-373. Maybe a connection to the natural history museum Berlin? Taxidermist of the museum?
But now I am a little bit confused about the authorship. Will be Theodor von Heuglin or Gustav Hartlaub be considered as author of the name? I ask as the title of the article is Beiträge zur der Ornithologie von Th. v. Heugelin while at the end of the article we Dr. G. Hartlaub.
As well I ask myself (if Avibase is correct) why Apus affinis galilejensis (Antinori, 1855) and not Apus affinis abessynicus (Streubel, 1848)? abessynicus pre-occupied by?
Cypselus abessynicus Streubel 1848 was long used for the tropical African populations of Apus affinis, until it was realised that Abyssinian populations of the species actually belonged to the same taxon as those of the Near-East, for which Cypselus galilejensis Antinori 1855 was in use.As well I ask myself (if Avibase is correct) why Apus affinis galilejensis (Antinori, 1855) and not Apus affinis abessynicus (Streubel, 1848)? abessynicus pre-occupied by?