• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Vangidae (3 Viewers)

Schetba

Jane L. Younger, Phoenix Dempster, Árpád S. Nyári, T. Olivia Helms, Marie J. Raherilalao, Steven M. Goodman & Sushma Reddy. Phylogeography of the Rufous Vanga and the role of bioclimatic transition zones in promoting speciation within Madagascar. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. In Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available online 14 June 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106535

Abstract:

Madagascar is known as a biodiversity hotspot, providing an ideal natural laboratory for investigating the processes of avian diversification. Yet, the phylogeography of Madagascar’s avifauna is still largely unexamined. In this study, we evaluated phylogeographic patterns and species limits within the Rufous Vanga, Schetba rufa, a monotypic genus of forest-dwelling birds endemic to the island. Using an integrative taxonomic approach, we synthesized data from over 4,000 ultra-conserved element (UCE) loci, mitochondrial DNA, multivariate morphometrics, and ecological niche modeling to uncover two reciprocally monophyletic, geographically circumscribed, and morphologically distinct clades of Schetba. The two lineages are restricted to eastern and western Madagascar, respectively, with distributions broadly consistent with previously described subspecies. Based on their genetic and morphological distinctiveness, the two subspecies merit recognition as separate species. The bioclimatic transition between the humid east and dry west of Madagascar likely promoted population subdivision and drove speciation in Schetba during the Pleistocene. Our study is the first evidence that an East-West bioclimatic transition zone played a role in the speciation of birds within Madagascar.
 
Because they speak of the Vangidae, even if their phylogeny tells us nothing more than what we know

 
« L'espèce nommée viridis par Gmelin (Analcipus hirundinaceus, Sw.), me donne le genre Leptopterus qui n'est autre que le Leptopteryx, Wagl., auquel, pour pouvoir l'adopter dans le sens restreint, je fais subir cette légère modification. »
"The species named viridis by Gmelin (Analcipus hirundinaceus, Sw.), gives me the genus Leptopterus which is none other than Leptopteryx, Wagl., to which, in order to be able to adopt it in the restricted sense, I make this slight modification."


Can someone explain to me why Bonaparte links the name Leptopteryx to Wagler, not Horsfield ?
 
The ref is to this : pars 1 - Systema avium - Biodiversity Heritage Library
Wagler attributed the name to Horsfield, so there is no question that "Leptopteryx, Wagl." is indeed Leptopteryx Horsfield. Horsfield used the genus name for a single species, so perhaps Bonaparte regarded Horsfield as having 'established' the 'broad concept'.
Anyway, Bonaparte was regularly quite obscure in his statements. ;)
 
Last edited:
Can anyone tell me which has priority - Schetba Lesson, 1831 or Euryceros Lesson, 1831?

Same author and date but different publications; however, I'm struggling to find precise dates.
 
Can anyone tell me which has priority - Schetba Lesson, 1831 or Euryceros Lesson, 1831?

Same author and date but different publications; however, I'm struggling to find precise dates.

Euryceros: t.22 (1831) - Annales des sciences naturelles - Biodiversity Heritage Library
The journal had three yearly volumes, with 4 monthly issues/volume.
This issue is dated "Avril 1831" in the footer of its first page, p. 337. (The next issue was in the next volume, and is dated "Mai 1831" in the footer of p. 5.) A report starting on p. 436 is presented as "Fait à l'Académie royale des sciences, le 25 avril 1831".

Unless you find additional info (e.g., a dated wrapper), I'd date this issue to 30 April 1831.

(It could fairly easily have appeared quite a bit later, though. The Académie des Sciences of Paris acknowledged the receipt of "Annales des sciences naturelles, Avril 1831" in its meeting of 11 Jul 1831 : Procès-verbaux des séances de l'Académie | Gallica . The journal was published in Paris : it's somewhat odd that it would take over two months to reach the Académie. I now note that the "Juin 1831" issue, pp. 112-224 of the next volume, included material dated "1er Août 1831" on p. 207.)

--------

Schetba: t.1 (1831) - Traité d'ornithologie

It's complicated ;)

The plan was that this book would appear in 8 livraisons, published monthly, each one with 5 in-8° sheets of text (= 80 pp) = 640 pp of text in total -- see the announcement in : Bull. Sci. Nat. Géol., 20: 477-478, Bulletin des sciences naturelles et de géologie

The actual text volume is 41.5 in-8° sheets = 664 pp, numbered 1-659 + 5 unnumbered blank pp at the end. (This is more than was originally planned.) Text sheets are numbered in the footer of their first page, 1 to 42. Additionally, there are also two full sheets of front matters (half-title & title pages (4 pp), dedicace (2 pp), Préface (6 pp), Considérations générales & Tableau méthodique (20 pp) = 32 pp in total, numbered [j]-xxxij).
The title page (p. [iij]) bears the date "1831"; the Préface is dated (p. [xij]) "Novembre 1830", and the Tableau méthodique (p. [xxiij]) "1830".

The livraisons were reported in Bibliographie de la France as follows :
Livr. 1, 5 sheets (= 80 pp): 13 Feb 1830 - Bibliographie de la France
Livr. 2, 5 sheets (= 80 pp): 08 May 1830 - Bibliographie de la France
Livr. 3, 5 sheets (= 80 pp): 10 Jul 1830 - Bibliographie de la France
Livr. 4, 5 sheets (= 80 pp): 25 Sep 1830 - Bibliographie de la France
[Livr. 5 is not known to have been reported anywhere.]​
Livr. 6, 4(!?) sheets (= 64(!?) pp): 05 Mar 1831 - Bibliographie de la France
Livr. 7, 5 sheets (= 80 pp): 09 Apr 1831 - Bibliographie de la France
Livr. 8, 5 sheets (= 80 pp): 11 Jun 1831 - Bibliographie de la France
[No livr. 9 appears to be mentioned anywhere.]​

A review in Bull. Sci. Nat. Géol., 22: 446-448, Bulletin des sciences naturelles et de géologie , dated Sep 1830 (see footer of p. 433) and signed "K." (= Kuhn?), covered the 4 first livraisons. This review indicated that the text, up to that point, extended to the Upupées which, judging from the book itself, means 20 sheets (320 pp) had been published, as expected.

What happened after this is conjectural -- among various problematic things are : the actual contents and date of livr. 5 are not known; the 4, rather than 5, sheets announced for livr. 6 could conceivably be an error; livraisons did not appear monthly as planned + the text ended longer than was planned despite one of the livraisons having been announced with less text than was planned, hence accepting that anything happened according to the plan without additional evidence is generally questionable; it is not known when the two sheets of front matters appeared, and whether (even though this may seem unlikely) they might have been counted in the sheets of any of the livraisons announced in 1831 in Bibliogr. France.

However, the logical place for p. 374 (54 pp after the last page of livr. 4) would be in livr. 5, and livr. 5 can presumably safely be assumed to have appeared before livr. 6, which we know had been published on 5 March 1831.

This seems to make Schetba reasonably safely senior to Euryceros. (Richmond actually dated it to "Nov.-Dec.? 1830." : https://zoonomen.net/cit/RI/Genera/S/s00162a.jpg )
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top