Too me to.the others . . . look a lot like Canaries too me.
I couldn't find any weaver that fit the features (overall colour, leg colour, eye colour, apparent bill size) either. Maybe I'm just looking at it wrongly....maybe it (the 'canary') is a weaver. Dunno.
I trust you weren't checking for that in the E Africa field guide. The weavers' bill-sizes in that book are grotesque.apparent bill size)
Well, I don't know about that but, unless it's obvious, then I check against my own photos when I have them, and also flick through online images (usually just Google images).I trust you weren't checking for that in the E Africa field guide. The weavers' bill-sizes in that book are grotesque.
I agree - but what alternative (canary or weaver) do you suggest? Maybe one of the Africa specialists will come along and give a confident ID. Your photos seem clear, so someone ought to be able to do this.First, thank you both for the effort!
How influenced by altitude are birds? (I'm more of a butterfly guy myself, and altitude plays heavily on where some species are found) Looking at the range of the Yellow-crowned Canary in Stevenson & Fanshawe gives me the impression that it is truly locked into higher altitude areas (which Lake Victoria/Entebbe is not).
I agree - but what alternative (canary or weaver) do you suggest? Maybe one of the Africa specialists will come along and give a confident ID. Your photos seem clear, so someone ought to be able to do this.
Well, that's all I have to offer. So let's hope someone else better than me comes across this post. The photos are good - however, in your original post you said 'the others', suggesting there were several, so if you have photos of the same (yellow) bird from a different angle, or other birds that you think are the same species, that would probably be helpful.
[Just in case it's not just me that's confused—I was suggesting little weaver for the right hand birds in the initial 2 photos. I can't see the backs of those at all. The left hand bird in photo 1 is clearly a weaver...]I´d suggest Golden-Backed (Jackson´s) Weaver females . Since I´ve also just been to the Botanical Gardens in February I do know that they are around there. Leg colour, not much white on belly, pretty strong streaking on back. Seems a better match than Little Weaver.
The second photo is a bit odd but it does not feel like a Canary to me. Probably also a Weaver IMO, the angle could just be a bit misleading.
That's a good point and it spurred me to look at Macauley images. The legs in the OP pic do seem very pink. Macauley suggests that both species can appear to have more or less pink or grey legs. Few of the pics I looked at for golden-backed were as pink as the OP's, and none of the little weaver pics. I felt the bill shape and general colouration I saw for golden-backed was less close to the OP than the little weaver pics, but perhaps that's marginal.And the leg colour for the bird on the right hand side in the first picture is a point against Little Weaver IMO