• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Willow warbler, chiffchaff or something else? (1 Viewer)

If there hadn't been a photo, that would have been my guess too, but with that dark beady eye, brownish throat and bulkier shape and bill, it's not a whitethroat.

not to mention the darkish legs...no guarantee of course that the same species is concerned in both sightings.

Rob
 
Is it possible to be certain that this isn't a booted warbler (unless there were several birds of course!)?
 
As we all know colours can appear very different in strong sunlight, but surely the apparently whiter outer tail feathers are real and not a visual effect.
Still a whitethroat for me.
 
I would have expected to see a striking white throat in the photo if this was the case. The bird shows a duskier throat with ear coverts that resemble GW rather than WT. And as Rob says, the eye is just completely wrong for WT.
 
The photo is taken in a strong light ("over exposed" pic), so the overall greyish colour of Garden warbler "dissappear" easily.
 
The white on the tail feathers is only on the outer margin, which rules out chaffinch immediately (not even looking at the bill). Mipit is nowhere even close.

It's clearly a warbler, and the white outer margins to the tail mean it's a Sylvia. So that's garden warbler, whitethorat or lesser whitethroat. Booted is unlikely enough to be discounted, and it hasn't got a cap so not a blackcap. Dark legs rule out whitethroat (and mipit! and chaffinch!). Lack of clear eye-ring rule out lesser whitethroat, and dark lores doesn't extend onto the cheek either. So that only leaves Graden Warbler.

Elementary, my dear Oddie.
 
Thought so too, just enough detail in second pic to clinch it. They certainly live up to their description in one of my books "keeps well hidden in the foliage, even when singing" it took me hours to get two pretty awful long distance shots. Thanks for the help.


Steve
 
Warning! This thread is more than 17 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top