• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Yarrell 1830 [Cygnus bewickii] (1 Viewer)

joekroex

Joek Roex
In trying to find the OD for Cygnus bewickii, I stumbled upon a nest of vipers, it seems.

The general consensus seems to be that the author is Yarrell, the year 1830. So far so good. But which publication?

First the story. A swan was shot on 7 Feb. 1829 near Haydon Bridge, Northumberland, UK. It came in the possesion of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Newcastle upon Tyne. R.R. Wingate was asked to prepare the swan for the Museum. He believed it to be a new species, but did not name it (narrative published in Transactions of the Natural History Society of Northumberland, Durham, and Newcastle upon Tyne 1 (1830?), 1–2 [here], read before the NHS on 20 Oct. 1829, but publication likely in 1831). He did sent it on to 'abler ornithologists'.

Yarrell acquired a swan shot in England (the mentioned specimen?) and presented its breastbone and trachea to the Linnean Society of London on 24 November 1829, convinced it to be a new species, though not naming it as he was still engaged in correspondence to obtain more information.

On 19 Jan. 1830, Yarrell presents his findings to the Linnean Society in a paper entitled "On a New Species of Wild Swan (Cygnus bewickii), Taken in England and Hitherto Confounded with the Hooper", and names the new species Cygnus Bewickii.

Publication of the new name takes place in various periodicals. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 16 ("1833") (1830), 453 [here] is the well-known reference, although according to Raphael in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2 (1970), 66 [here] the date should be 1830 (27 May).

The description, "[Cygnus] rostro semicylindrico atro, basi aurantiacâ, corpore albo, caudâ rectricibus 18, pedibus nigris," found its way into other publications preceding the Transactions piece. Coues's "American Ornithological Bibliography" (3rd Instalment) in Bulletin of the Unites States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 5, no. 4 (1879), 937 [here], lists most them. Alan Peterson copies the list on zoonomen [here]. I've used only the earliest publications here.

February 1830, right after the meeting at which Yarrell presents the name, the following journals publish the description:

  • Zoological Journal 5, no. 17 (1830), 133 [here]. Part of a summary of the meetings of various societies, this being the 'Zoological Club of the Linnean Society', according to Coues (and thus Peterson) authored by Blackwall, though no author is given, hence my assumption it is written by the editor, Vigors. Detailed is the Nov. 1829 meeting, with a footnote updating the identification issue to the Jan. 1830 meeting, including the description – according to Everhuis [here] published Feb. 1830;
  • Philosophical Magazine, n.s., 7, no. 38 (1830) 146 [here]. Another summary of the 19 Jan. meeting, this time the description 'basi aurantiacâ' is replaced by 'cerâ flavâ' – wrapper says 'Published the First Day of every Month', thus 1 Feb. 1830;
  • Edinburgh Journal of Natural and Geographical Science 1, no. 6 (1830), 477 – this is the publication listed as the OD by Peterson and HBWAlive [here], but this has a Mar. 1830, although HBWAlive mentions a note in no. 5, 381, which has a Feb. 1830 date.
The particular volume and issues of the Edinburgh Journal I cannot find. If there are no dates specified better than a month for both the Zoological Journal and the Edinburgh Journal, then according to the ICZN code (art. 21.3), the last day of the month should be adopted. If publication of the Philosophical Magazine was on 1 Feb. 1830, shouldn't this publication have priority?
 
In; The Zoological Journal, for "February—June, 1830" (see p.145), bound in vol. 5 ("1832-1834"), we find the words of "Mr. Blackwall on the Cygnus Bewickii", in; Art. XXIX. Observations on a newly described Species of Swan. By JOHN BLACKWALL, Esq., F.L.S., &c. (here), on pp.189-191, with a cross-reference, as to:
The London Literary Gazette, published on the 23rd of January, contains the following notice, under the head " Linnean Society," pages 56, 57. ...
... which takes us to The London Literary Gazette (and Journal of Belles Lettres, Arts, Sciences,) (here, page 56, bottom right corner), under the heading "ARTS AND SCIENCES. LINNÆN SOCIETY", where we find the following phrase/s:
... Another interesting communication, from the pen of William Yarell, ... on a new Swan ... with an appropriate eulogium on the merits of the celebrated Bewick of Newcastle, ...
But note; there's no scientific name given in the latter paper (published "Saturday, January 23, 1830").

If relevant, if of interest?

/B
 
In; The Zoological Journal, for "February—June, 1830" (see p.145), bound in vol. 5 ("1832-1834"), we find the words of "Mr. Blackwall on the Cygnus Bewickii", in; Art. XXIX. Observations on a newly described Species of Swan. By JOHN BLACKWALL, Esq., F.L.S., &c. (here), on pp.189-191, with a cross-reference, as to:

... which takes us to The London Literary Gazette (and Journal of Belles Lettres, Arts, Sciences,) (here, page 56, bottom right corner), under the heading "ARTS AND SCIENCES. LINNÆN SOCIETY", where we find the following phrase/s:
But note; there's no scientific name given in the latter paper (published "Saturday, January 23, 1830").

If relevant, if of interest?

/B

Thanks, Björn, I have seen those papers, it makes for interesting reading.

Re the Edinburgh Journal: the Feb. 1830 issue 5 seems to suggest (Richmond card of Anas Cygneus Bewickii, [here]) a completely different author, John and/or Albany Hancock (brothers). Is the name meant to be binomial?
 
Thanks everyone. I agree with Dr. Peterson.
Here is a small article by Yarrell dated 2/5/30.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/53110#page/214/mode/1up .
Here is an anonymous critique of Yarrell:
Page 130 of
https://books.google.com/books?id=D...v=onepage&q="Cygnus bewickii" Wingate&f=false . Most interesting to me it states that both Wingate and Selby articles were to have drawing attached but I have not seen them. Perhaps Wingate named the swan on a drawing.
Article about Bewick and Hancock:
http://www.bewicksociety.org/Cherryburn Times pdfs/ct_vol4_no2_spring2002.pdf .
Please read footnote 5 of:
https://britishbirds.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/article_files/V102/V102_N03/V102_N3_2_7.pdf .
 
Last edited:
... but I have not seen them. Perhaps Wingate named the swan on a drawing.
...
Mark, "July 1830": "Several Engravings to illustrate Mr Selby's paper on the new Swan (Cygnus Bewickii) having been presented by ..." and onwards (here), which takes us here, ("1831"): and to Plate V, Plate VI and Plate VII.

The only other Early (contemporary) illustration/s that I could find is from Illustrations of Ornithology, by Jardine & Selby, vol.II ("1826-1835"); Plates/s; here, (in colour, not much ;)) alt. here (in black-and-white) + its/their text here: "CYGNUS BEWICKII, Wingate. Bewick's Swan.", with a reference to: "Cygnus Bewickii, Selby, in ..."

And in Illustrations of American Ornithology ... (Edinburgh, 1835), we find Captain Thomas Brown's Plate of: "CYGNUS BEWICKII, BEWICK'S SWAN", here (in tiny Print, bottom left Corner), also as "C. Bewickii, in the Systematic Index (p.iii, here) [Note that "Capt. Thos. Brown?" (also) was mentioned on the Richmond Card (link in post #7)].

Hopefully of some use/help?

However; enjoy!

/B
--
 
Last edited:

Thanks for the BB reference, Mark. Very interesting, but I do still think that not the Transactions LS paper quoted is the first instance of publication but the Philosophical Magazine p. 146 [here], which is a summary of the meeting of 19 Jan. 1830, and which connects Yarrell to Cygnus Bewickii and which carries the description. The Edinburgh Journal that is quoted by Peterson seems to have been published later (see above #1).
 
Thanks Björn thats what I was missing!
Joek Roex I guess the Philosophical Magazine is first. I believe there was a proposal to the ICZN that published articles about oral reports could not take priority over the later formal descriptions but it failed to pass. So is the author Yarrell in Taylor & Philips editors Philisophical Magazine?? I still would like to see Vol. 1 of the Edinburgh journal.
 
Last edited:
... I believe there was a proposal to the ICZN that published articles about oral reports could not take priority over the later formal descriptions but it failed to pass. ...
If that's the case, then newspapers published the day after the meeting would also need to be checked, in case they reported on the meeting in a manner which happened to satisfy the ICZN publication rules :eek!:
 
I still would like to see Vol. 1 of the Edinburgh journal.
Mark, as do I, but sorry, I cannot help you on this one (No.1 is not kept in any Swedish Library and I haven't seen/found it digitized anywhere), though it seems to be kept not that far away from you, in the USC Libraries (Los Angeles, CA) here. Even if Closed at present (due to Corona/Covid-19), so don't go searching for it.

Better to stay safe (in front of the screen), until it's all over.
 
I found a four page review of vol 1 in Isis. It repeats Jardine's description of Sylvia atricapilla heineken (Jardine, 1830) and it mentions Thomas Brown but I could not see A. C. bewickii.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/85170#page/322/mode/1up .

The only mention of bewickii in that volume of Isis is in col. 1234 [here], with a reference to the Zoological Journal 5, no. 18 (1830), 189 [here], which is the Blackwall piece, which dates after 7 April 1830.
 
After yet another attempt to find No.1 of the Edinburgh Journal ... (but no luck, I still didn't manage to find it digitized), here's some additional info, possibly of interest, for anyone who might pursue the task of trying to locate it, in a physical Library (after the coronavirus pandemic).

It might be worth to look for an Edinburgh Journal of Natural Science (without the "and Geographical" part), as it was mentioned as such in the (Medical journal) The Lancet 1830, here (vol. 1, London, Saturday, October 17, 1829-30):
THE Edinburgh Journal of Natural Science, for the present month, a new periodical, ...
Of course, there's nothing said about Bewick's Swan in this purely Medical context (about hermaphrodism). I just happened to note the different (somewhat shorter) name/Title of the Edinburgh Journal itself.

It's also mentioned, as ditto, for example/s; here, here, here and here (the latter, in the normally trustworthy Encyclopaedia Britannica) ... and elsewhere.

We could be looking at a case where the Edinburgh naturalists (or/and its Editor Ainsworth) altered the Title itself of their brand "new" Journal as early as post-No.1 ... ?

Who knows?

Hopefully of some help/use?

/B

PS. Either way: not to confuse, neither with Schouler's The Edinburgh Journal of Natural Science, 1838–39, nor with Brown's The Edinburgh Journal of Natural History (and the Physical Sciences), 1835–1840.

Those guys in Edinburgh sure was into their Natural Science! ;)
 
The particular volume and issues of the Edinburgh Journal I cannot find. If there are no dates specified better than a month for both the Zoological Journal and the Edinburgh Journal, then according to the ICZN code (art. 21.3), the last day of the month should be adopted. If publication of the Philosophical Magazine was on 1 Feb. 1830, shouldn't this publication have priority?
Now that the Edinburgh Journal has been found, I'm with you on this one - I think the OD is in the Philosophical Magazine.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 3 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top