Totally agree! Given that renders 99,9% of your posts futile, maybe it is time to call it quits?My point is, you should try a binocular yourself and not rely on what somebody else says about it.......
Totally agree! Given that renders 99,9% of your posts futile, maybe it is time to call it quits?My point is, you should try a binocular yourself and not rely on what somebody else says about it.......
Be careful what you wish for. Much of Birdforum is about members exchanging their views on binoculars and sharing their experiences of them. And long may this continue.Totally agree! Given that renders 99,9% of your posts futile, maybe it is time to call it quits?
Agree with you completely, but there are ways of exchanging views that are perhaps less invasive and domineering!Be careful what you wish for. Much of Birdforum is about members exchanging their views on binoculars and sharing their experiences of them. And long may this continue.
Lee
MODERATOR
Because the "normal" user definitely notices the 2% more transmission but definitely not the imaging errors!Andreas. I don't understand. Could you explain a little more?
Denying members the opportunity of sharing their strongly felt enthusiasms would diminish Birdforum's role as a place where opinions are exchanged IMHO.Agree with you completely, but there are ways of exchanging views that are perhaps less invasive and domineering!
I respectfully doubt this. As I wrote:If you are young, the SLC probably will be brighter because of the bigger exit pupil in low light. If you are older and your pupils are not reaching their maximum dilation of 7 mm, the HT and SLC would probably appear the same.
You forgot to end your post with „.Period.“All of this might be all well and dandy, but, it does not change the fact that the Zeiss Victory 10x42 fl is the finest birding binocular ever made.
Pete.