Hello Sean,
Perhaps I'll get my head around this one day, I have been looking closely at the illustrations in Lang and Harrop without paying much attention to the text, I have now realised that the text does not match the illustrations. Both references show a necklace pattern on the lip in their illustrations, and then state clearly that the lip is unmarked! that I'm sorry has led to my confusion.
One would presume that the Lang photo is genuine, and now a near as damn it likeness has appeared in two consecutive years at Radipole, should atrofuscus perhaps be retained but with a corrected description?
Sorry for my ignorance in the previous post.
Alan
Ref the Red helleborines in the Chilterns, may I remind everyone that the plants are now inside a double enclosure with no access, so apart from the fact that you shouldn't visit the site unaccompanied by a warden - or by pre-arrangement - there isn't much point anyway.
There is a single plant outside the enclosure but it often gets eaten off by Muntjac before it gets to flower. I guess it is not "wire-hatted" as it is some way outside the enclosure and that would draw attention to it. Neither do they put copper rings around it, so the slugs can also have a go. I think it last flowered in 2008.
The Hampshire plants have not flowered for a number of years now, and no rosettes have been found in the last two. That is another site which is protected by enclosures which shouldn't be entered without prior permission from Hampshire County Council, who manage the site. Plants formerly flowered in more than one area outside the enclosure, so wandering around the wood might end up in trampling of any undiscovered rosettes.
The only place to see Red helleborine is the Gloucestershire site, and you won't get close enough to them to photograph them.
Regards
Sean
Hi Sean,
I definitely saw that plant outside the cage in bud last year (2 buds), though it was quite scraggy and it was also protected by a cage. Think I'll be going on an official walk with the warden next year...finger's crossed for a good show!
Feeling a good year for a Ghost or two? Consecutive very cold snowy winters could be a goer! Btw, have you seen the new photos Tim Rich has posted on iSpot of the 2009 Ghost? It's interesting...
Mike.
Marsh helleborines are now out in the Norfolk fens...
That is rather weird then Rich,was it at your local friburgensis site?
Hi Alan
For names to be used they have to be verified, with a type specimen and a Latin description, by the ICBN. Atrofuscus never had any of this, so should be replaced and forgotten. It means pretty much the same as fulvofusca anyway = dark!!
The picture in Harrap was copied by Richard Millington from the only published photo of the Sussex plant. The reason it appears to show a necklace is that on the original photo the light from the sun - or flash - made a white line on the edge of the speculum. This was copied as a feature by RGM.
As for the Radipole plants, I have seen others elsewhere equally as plain and dark, with only a slight necklace. There is only one plant there which fully confirms with the fulfvofusca description.
Hope this is clear......
Hi all, have a look at this hybrid Southern Marsh orchid I found in NW Leics last week.
I just wonder what people think as I'm a bit stumped on the parentage of the orchid?
Cheers,
Dave.
http://davidearlgray.blogspot.com/
Hi all, have a look at this hybrid Southern Marsh orchid I found in NW Leics last week.
I just wonder what people think as I'm a bit stumped on the parentage of the orchid?
Cheers,
Dave.
How's this one for emarginata? One of a number of unusual Pyramidal Orchids seen near Bristol yesterday.
Alan