Bill, I practically invited you to ignore me, if the alternative is vituperation like posts 14 and 22.
Are you serious?
Of course I had no intention of obstructing exploration of this topic. I wasn't fooling around with semantics, but trying to make clear what I had said about that segue itself and get out of the way. That didn't seem to work, so I left.
Days later, I still don't see how the attachment in post 14 illustrates the "confusion" alleged in post 1, but perhaps this will be clarified as the topic is further explored, so yes, please do carry on. I thought you might have by now.