• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Empids; Nashville, TN 3 Sept 21 (1 Viewer)

hamlinjk15u

Well-known member
United States
Constantly unsure of Empids, they all look so incredibly alike in the guides.

The first 5 in this series are the same bird. Thin but obvious dual wing bars, small compact body, sitting sort of leaned forward. Long tail with dip in the middle. What I dont see at all is an eyering. Fairly long primary projection. My thinking on this one was Eastern Wood-Pewee.

6th pic is a separate bird, different area of the same park. I noticed its sitting more upright and less stocky than the first 5. Looks to have hint of eyering and dual wing bars. out of focus so that doesnt help. Does look to have a fairly yellow underside, but that may just be the lighting, as it is more uniform. Kind of still leaning towards Eastern Wood-Pewee on this one as well, but it seems to have a different build and silhouette than the first 5 photos

7th and 8th have distinct eyering and wing bars, short tails, what seems to be an all-yellow beak instead of the typical empid yellow bottom, black top beak. Seems to have shorter primary projection as well.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0168.JPG
    DSC_0168.JPG
    1,018.9 KB · Views: 19
  • DSC_0165.JPG
    DSC_0165.JPG
    846.4 KB · Views: 21
  • DSC_0157.JPG
    DSC_0157.JPG
    870.2 KB · Views: 20
  • DSC_0156.JPG
    DSC_0156.JPG
    734.1 KB · Views: 19
  • DSC_0152.JPG
    DSC_0152.JPG
    778.3 KB · Views: 18
  • DSC_0101.JPG
    DSC_0101.JPG
    639.3 KB · Views: 18
  • DSC_0058.JPG
    DSC_0058.JPG
    614.1 KB · Views: 18
  • DSC_0054.JPG
    5.6 MB · Views: 9
Warning! This thread is more than 3 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top