sputnik said:
As reguards some of the other comments, ie."because he had a gun but didn't fire and was in the area of the birds where known persicution is known to go on he was guilty". Please!!! This is like saying someone in a shop where known shoplifting goes on and picks up an item to look at it before buying it, it definatly a shoplifter and should be fined.
As far as I recall, the gamekeeper was charged with an 'attempt' of the Offence. So
if my memory serves me right, under the
Criminal Attempts Act 1981 (s1) :
"
If, with intent to commit an offence to which this section applies, this person does an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of an offence, he is guilty of Committing the Offence"
In other words, the above forms the actus rea (the 'act') necessary for establishing an inchoate offence, where 'attempt' is the issue.
Can't comment on the actual case or individual - However, the intention of a person accused of attempt, (mens rea), or if you like, 'the state of mind', of the accused is a matter to be established in Court, given all the evidence, background, locality of the particular person in relation to, or in the vicinity of, for example, a Harrier nest. However, being
also in
possession of a firearm capable of causing injury or killing birds, while in the vicinity of a Schedule 1 species could be deemed as an act 'more than merely preparatory' to secure a conviction of attempting to kill or injure wild birds', if intention to so do has been established.
As far as I know, would be the same for Attempted Theft: if person placed an article in their pocket before reaching the counter - enough to establish 'intention' for 'attempt' possibly - but act not completed until he/she has
tried to leave the premises without paying. (Of course if he/she actually manages to leave the premises, the charge is Theft rather than Attempted Theft)
(incidently powers of arrest for 'attempt' of an offence are exactly the same as the powers of arrest provided for when the offence is actually being committed)
sputnik said:
Came across this forum purly by accident.
I have read it with great interest and found some of the comments to be total rot.
"Fat chance a raptor getting sliced & shreaded".
I have acually seen crows flying between the blades as they turn, with out any bother.
Plenty more 'rot' like this on the windfarms threads, you could post your comments there (be careful though, evidence suggests you could get you sliced up by the response to opinions like this in the process
)