The Trinovid BA series, early designated Trinovid 'Ultras,' now over 20 years old, still attracts attention and praise in threads on birdforum.net. Some experienced users appear to prefer BAs to subsequent Leica models and to high-end 'alpha' binoculars of other brands, despite recognized advances in brightness and reduced chromatic aberration in the newer versions.
Following are some speculations about technical features of the BAs that might account in part for their continuing popularity. I have suggested some of these in another thread; they are collected and expanded here. The speculations are based mostly on notes in various birdforum.net threads, not on any real expertise or knowledge on my part. Where possible, links to the sources are included.
Known or suggested properties of Trinovid BA binoculars:
-- modern mechanics: internal focusing, elegant combined diopter/focus adjustment, etc.
-- well documented very rugged (if somewhat heavy) construction
-- phase-coated prisms: Although apparently not advertised for the BAs, all the Trinovid 'Ultras,' BAs as well as BNs, had phase-coated prisms.
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/leica-ba-bn-phase-coating.22413/>
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/trinovid-8x32-ba-how-does-it-compare.312587/>
-- leaded glass: This is uncertain. It has been suggested that Leica's transition to unleaded glass was undertaken during the production run of BAs, prior to the introduction of the BN design.
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/leica-trinovid-10x50-lead-free-or-not.117677/>
However, this seems unlikely. A change of glass type generally calls for re-computation of optical elements -- thicknesses and surface curves, spacings, mating glasses, etc. -- and corresponding, often expensive, re-tooling of production equipment. It would seem unusual for a company to assume the expenses involved within a particular model run, but not unlikely for it to be part of a change of models, such as from BAs to BNs. A change of focus range in the BNs (see next point) could be consistent with an optical formula recomputed for a change away from leaded glass.
Thus, if the transition to unleaded glass in Leica binoculars was, indeed, made during the BA/BN era, BAs might have been the last to enjoy the optical benefits of leaded glass, benefits maybe not fully realized in alternative, unleaded glasses for some time afterwards.
-- focus range extending beyond infinity, of some help in particular to myopic users: There was a general change of focus range between BA and BN models. The BNs had a well-advertised closer near focus point, highlighted by the 'N' (for 'near') in their designation. A loss of most or all of the focus range beyond infinity, characteristic of BAs, went largely unadvertised.
(Interestingly, if the Trinovid mechanics were left unchanged between BA and BN models, as seemed mostly the case with respect to appearance and operation, and a choice likely attractive for reasons of production economy, both changes of focus range could have been accounted for by a reduction of focal length in the BN optics re-computed for the change away from leaded glass, rather than by a physical resetting of the focusing mechanism as widely supposed.)
-- improved lens coatings: This is another uncertain issue. Changes of lens coatings should not involve expensive retooling of the sort required for optical or mechanical changes, so might well be employed during model runs.
The 'HDC' (high durability coating) was a heralded feature of the BNs, but there have been reports that it was employed on other models before those.
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/difference-between-leica-bas-and-bns.32242/>
<http://www.company7.com/leica/news.html#1September2000>
It has been suggested that late-production BAs were among those provided with the HDC coatings, but that has not been established.
The BA line was also produced during a period of rapid advances in anti-reflection coatings. Changes in such coatings within the BA lineage have been suggested. Variations of reflected colors among coatings have been reported within model lines of Leica (and other brand) binoculars, ranging from yellowish-green, through blue, to dark or nearly none.
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/evolution-of-trinovid-coatings.68039/>
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/leica-trinovid-10x32bn-lense-coatings.144632/>
It is uncertain whether these color differences indicate coating differences significant, e.g., for transmission, color rendition, or flare control. The possibility that late-run BAs enjoyed improved anti-reflection coatings remains open, but undetermined. It would be instructive to have comparisons by experienced users between early and late versions of the BAs with respect to aspects of performance related to coatings.
The Trinovid BAs were Leica's premier binoculars during their production and represented an acknowledged landmark advance in binocular design, setting the bar for models introduced later by many manufacturers, as well as by Leica itself. But they were also produced during a singular period of change in Leica binoculars when they could have benefitted from the advantages of both older and newer technology -- a period not matched in that regard before or after. Thus, in addition to their well publicized innovative features, they might have quietly retained advantageous older technologies (leaded glass?) and also, later during production, incorporated improvements (newer lens coatings?) not explicitly announced until introduction of subsequent models. The BAs thus could have been a 'sweet spot' in the development of Leica binoculars, explaining in part their enduring popularity among those owning and using them, as well as their impressive maintenance of value on the used market.
Comments and corrections from more informed and experienced users in the forum community would be very welcome.
Larry
Following are some speculations about technical features of the BAs that might account in part for their continuing popularity. I have suggested some of these in another thread; they are collected and expanded here. The speculations are based mostly on notes in various birdforum.net threads, not on any real expertise or knowledge on my part. Where possible, links to the sources are included.
Known or suggested properties of Trinovid BA binoculars:
-- modern mechanics: internal focusing, elegant combined diopter/focus adjustment, etc.
-- well documented very rugged (if somewhat heavy) construction
-- phase-coated prisms: Although apparently not advertised for the BAs, all the Trinovid 'Ultras,' BAs as well as BNs, had phase-coated prisms.
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/leica-ba-bn-phase-coating.22413/>
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/trinovid-8x32-ba-how-does-it-compare.312587/>
-- leaded glass: This is uncertain. It has been suggested that Leica's transition to unleaded glass was undertaken during the production run of BAs, prior to the introduction of the BN design.
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/leica-trinovid-10x50-lead-free-or-not.117677/>
However, this seems unlikely. A change of glass type generally calls for re-computation of optical elements -- thicknesses and surface curves, spacings, mating glasses, etc. -- and corresponding, often expensive, re-tooling of production equipment. It would seem unusual for a company to assume the expenses involved within a particular model run, but not unlikely for it to be part of a change of models, such as from BAs to BNs. A change of focus range in the BNs (see next point) could be consistent with an optical formula recomputed for a change away from leaded glass.
Thus, if the transition to unleaded glass in Leica binoculars was, indeed, made during the BA/BN era, BAs might have been the last to enjoy the optical benefits of leaded glass, benefits maybe not fully realized in alternative, unleaded glasses for some time afterwards.
-- focus range extending beyond infinity, of some help in particular to myopic users: There was a general change of focus range between BA and BN models. The BNs had a well-advertised closer near focus point, highlighted by the 'N' (for 'near') in their designation. A loss of most or all of the focus range beyond infinity, characteristic of BAs, went largely unadvertised.
(Interestingly, if the Trinovid mechanics were left unchanged between BA and BN models, as seemed mostly the case with respect to appearance and operation, and a choice likely attractive for reasons of production economy, both changes of focus range could have been accounted for by a reduction of focal length in the BN optics re-computed for the change away from leaded glass, rather than by a physical resetting of the focusing mechanism as widely supposed.)
-- improved lens coatings: This is another uncertain issue. Changes of lens coatings should not involve expensive retooling of the sort required for optical or mechanical changes, so might well be employed during model runs.
The 'HDC' (high durability coating) was a heralded feature of the BNs, but there have been reports that it was employed on other models before those.
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/difference-between-leica-bas-and-bns.32242/>
<http://www.company7.com/leica/news.html#1September2000>
It has been suggested that late-production BAs were among those provided with the HDC coatings, but that has not been established.
The BA line was also produced during a period of rapid advances in anti-reflection coatings. Changes in such coatings within the BA lineage have been suggested. Variations of reflected colors among coatings have been reported within model lines of Leica (and other brand) binoculars, ranging from yellowish-green, through blue, to dark or nearly none.
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/evolution-of-trinovid-coatings.68039/>
<https://www.birdforum.net/threads/leica-trinovid-10x32bn-lense-coatings.144632/>
It is uncertain whether these color differences indicate coating differences significant, e.g., for transmission, color rendition, or flare control. The possibility that late-run BAs enjoyed improved anti-reflection coatings remains open, but undetermined. It would be instructive to have comparisons by experienced users between early and late versions of the BAs with respect to aspects of performance related to coatings.
The Trinovid BAs were Leica's premier binoculars during their production and represented an acknowledged landmark advance in binocular design, setting the bar for models introduced later by many manufacturers, as well as by Leica itself. But they were also produced during a singular period of change in Leica binoculars when they could have benefitted from the advantages of both older and newer technology -- a period not matched in that regard before or after. Thus, in addition to their well publicized innovative features, they might have quietly retained advantageous older technologies (leaded glass?) and also, later during production, incorporated improvements (newer lens coatings?) not explicitly announced until introduction of subsequent models. The BAs thus could have been a 'sweet spot' in the development of Leica binoculars, explaining in part their enduring popularity among those owning and using them, as well as their impressive maintenance of value on the used market.
Comments and corrections from more informed and experienced users in the forum community would be very welcome.
Larry