-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
coolpix 4500, am I buying the right one? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter eiggman
- Start date
Hi,
Yep, the cp4500 will do you very nicely. The cp4300 isn't too bad but it is a bit restrictive in a few ways, it does have full manual exposure control but it is buried very deep in the menus. Shutter-priority isn't quite as useful for digiscoping as Aperture priority but both are easily available on the cp4500.
Regards,
Andy
Yep, the cp4500 will do you very nicely. The cp4300 isn't too bad but it is a bit restrictive in a few ways, it does have full manual exposure control but it is buried very deep in the menus. Shutter-priority isn't quite as useful for digiscoping as Aperture priority but both are easily available on the cp4500.
Regards,
Andy
Jay Turberville
Well-known member
eiggman said:
You might want to check the discussions on the Contax SL300R and the similar Kyocera cameras as well.
The 4500 certainly is not a bad choice and still does the job very well (I have one). However, in many areas it is starting to show its age. IMO it is too big, has a too small display, it is slower than many competitors, does not have a very reliable autofocus, its focus confirmation is poor and the battery economy is not very good either - by today's standards. On the other hand the accurate exposure, colour balance, macro capabilities, swivel-body, a true filter thread and many other details make it STILL one of the most versatile digital cameras and also very well suited for digiscoping.eiggman said:
If I were buying a camera just for digiscoping, I probably would take Canon A80 or maybe the new Contax/Kyocera, but if macrophotography is at all important, the CP4500 is still a strong contender.
Ilkka
That is true, to my knowledge Contax is only available as 3mpix - for now. In my use even 2mpix is usually enough because I don't make large prints - more like documenting my observations. But yes, it may be going back if you need all that resolution. OTOH digiscoped images are often so soft (for many reasons like moving target, shaking tripod & head, haze...) that I would say that going over 3-4mpix is overkill for many of us - others may disagree.eiggman said:
Ilkka
IanF
Moderator
From the demo shots I have seen, the CP4500 still wins on quality of results. I look on the Contax / Kyocera as an option once the CP4500 is no longer available. I have seen not reports that the Cp4500 can be bettered, but I'm sure and hopeful that day won't be too far off.
My memory possibly fails me but isn't the Kyocera available in a 4 mp version ?
It's one of the things I'll be checking out at the Bird Fair this weekend. I'm hoping Andy will be there with his Contax :t:
My memory possibly fails me but isn't the Kyocera available in a 4 mp version ?
It's one of the things I'll be checking out at the Bird Fair this weekend. I'm hoping Andy will be there with his Contax :t:
