I recently noticed that many opus entries about locations are listed as stubs, even if they are quite long. The Opus help says "A good place to start is on our list of stubs - pages which only have a sentence or two at current and need expanding."
Certainly some of this articles need expanding with some more infos or pictures. But why for example is this a stub:
http://www.birdforum.net/opus/Istanbul_and_the_Bosphorus_Turkey
I'm also a bit angry with the recent changes in the locations area. Of course, as discussed in another thread, it's wise to have a template for locations. But to rip apart old articles that they just fix in and don't make any sense at all doesn't improve the articles. I already had to repair the one about the Cassonsgrat in Switzerland and will do so with the others.
Greetings from Switzerland
André
Certainly some of this articles need expanding with some more infos or pictures. But why for example is this a stub:
http://www.birdforum.net/opus/Istanbul_and_the_Bosphorus_Turkey
I'm also a bit angry with the recent changes in the locations area. Of course, as discussed in another thread, it's wise to have a template for locations. But to rip apart old articles that they just fix in and don't make any sense at all doesn't improve the articles. I already had to repair the one about the Cassonsgrat in Switzerland and will do so with the others.
Greetings from Switzerland
André
