• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

What causes eyestrain when using a binocular? (1 Viewer)

Ted Y.

Forum member
Canada
The binocular appears collimated, and the “barrels” seem identical.
What else can induce eyestrain when using a binocular for a short time?

In order to reduce the eyestrain:
Better to use a porro or a roof prism binocular?
Better to use a 6x30 or a 10x42?
 
As far as I understand, binoculars are tiny telescopes aligned together (forgive any lack of technical correction, not sure if alignment and collimation are exact synonyms), and in order to give a satisfactory experience, the two tubes must be aligned to a quite small tolerance. So:

  • if the difference is quite big, you will simply see two different images, and your brain won't be able to fix it or merge them in one single image (what any properly adjusted binocular does), this is why sometimes many viewers claim to "see double", like if they were drunk; a double image is a clear sign of a severe lack of alignment.
  • however, even if everything looks OK from the outside, the two tubes can still be poorly aligned, in some cases not enough to cause double vision, but indeed to "force" your brain in order to merge those images into one. So, you can use the binoculars, you get an apparently "correct image" (a single focused subject), but when you put the binoculars down you feel discomfort, as in eyestrain or headache, sometimes in the frown, between your eyes. Again, this can vary from a sudden and noticeable pain between your eyes the moment you put the binoculars down (when you suddenly feel your eyesight coming back to normal) to a lesser headache of varying intensity, which sometimes only manifests itself after a more pronounced use.

Anyway, be it a serious miscollimation (where you see double) or a lesser lack of alignment (varying from a "jump to norma" to varying levels of eyestrain or headache, a properly aligned and a properly adjusted binoculars should cause no eyestrain whatsoever, so if your unit does, it's a living evidence that it's not quite right, even is the barrels seem identical (we are talking about minute differences that are not detectable from the outside).

I'm sure more knowledgeable forum members will inform you in further detail, but basically: if you set up your binoculars properly (dioptre adjustment, cups up/down, correct interpupillary distance, proper eye positioning, etc.) the view should be easy and free of any strain, regardless of the configuration you choose, be it 6x30, 8x32, 10x42, etc.
It is true that some users prefer some formats for a series of reasons. For example, I like 7x35 or 7x42 because I find them "easy on the eye", the view is relaxed, there is a stable view with plenty of depth of field, but this is just a "personal sensory" preference. I've used 6x, 7x, 8x, 10x, 12x binoculars and, when properly adjusted, none has caused any strain, although I tend to find binoculars with smaller exit pupil and bigger magnification a less easy to use, while big exit pupil and lower magnification feels effortless and pleasurable to my eyes.
 
The binocular appears collimated, and the “barrels” seem identical.
What else can induce eyestrain when using a binocular for a short time?

In order to reduce the eyestrain:
Better to use a porro or a roof prism binocular?
Better to use a 6x30 or a 10x42?
There are two major culprets: Spatial Accommodation and Dioptric Accommodation. The attached describes Spatial Accommodation. If you want information on Dioptric Accommodation, I will send you that, too. You seem to be seeking more in-depth information. You won't find it on bino forums. Use Wikipedia to FIND a COMPETANT source and then go directly there. Too many times people want instant solutions (opinions) to complex problems (facts) without being willing to take the time to learn. That is not in the realm of many optical realities.
I asked for a collimation check under warranty.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-03-24 at 9.23.08 AM copy.png
    Screen Shot 2020-03-24 at 9.23.08 AM copy.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 23
Last edited:
If you want information on Dioptric Accommodation, I will send you that, too. You seem to be seeking more in-depth information.
Please send me information on Dioptric Accommodation.
I done some search on Internet and I found verry little about.
Except different opinions.
 
Please send me information on Dioptric Accommodation.
I done some search on Internet and I found verry little about.
Except different opinions.
I will do so tomorrow at the earliest. 'Tied up in the morning. MY opinion is based on the science.
 
I will do so tomorrow at the earliest. 'Tied up in the morning. MY opinion is based on the science.
Hi, Ted, On another thread you seem to indicate only two posts needing attention. As you gain knowledge of optics and binoculars, you will see that the FOUR I mentioned are all related. I did not find the original text I wanted. Categorized as best I could, my computer still has tens of thousands of documents on it. The attached is an article I did for Times of the Islands. I will continue to look for the original article if this doesn't answer your questions. The last two pages are the most important for your needs.

PS All of these photos are right side up on my computer. However, computer geeks rule the world. Let me know if you can read it.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.22.08 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.22.08 AM.png
    467 KB · Views: 20
  • Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.18.37 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.18.37 AM.png
    444.5 KB · Views: 16
  • Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.19.10 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.19.10 AM.png
    405.1 KB · Views: 17
  • Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.19.57 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.19.57 AM.png
    484.6 KB · Views: 21
  • Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.20.49 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.20.49 AM.png
    447.7 KB · Views: 23
  • Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.21.32 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-01-15 at 11.21.32 AM.png
    392.1 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:
Let me know if you can read it.
I can read it, I rotated the monitor 90° o_O :unsure: The computer geeks does not rule the world (yet). Is just more expensive to adapt.
Thank you

The last two pages are the most important for your needs.
I will take some time to try and observe how this is happening.
Just as a mention, I am culturally conditioned 'not to stare'.
 
I can read it, I rotated the monitor 90° o_O :unsure: The computer geeks does not rule the world (yet). Is just more expensive to adapt.
Thank you


I will take some time to try and observe how this is happening.
Just as a mention, I am culturally conditioned 'not to stare'.
Most of us are. Navy Opticalman training did away with that for me.
 
It is possible a binocular with light transmission 90% to create less eyestress than one with light transmission 80%?
Nope. My friend, the eyestrain you keep worrying about is all self-inflicted. People who look for problems will always find them. If you deal with the 2 major contributions I told you about, others anomalies would be taken to the "not to worry" category. I realize there is enough to worry about on bino forums to keep you worried, forever. However, most of those worries come from optically clueless people! People who build their lives around hearsay and flawed opinions! Break away from that crowd.
 
Last edited:
Nope. My friend, the eyestrain you keep worrying about is all self-inflicted. People who look for problems will always find them. If you deal with the 2 major contributions I told you about, others anomalies would be taken to the "not to worry" category. I realize there is enough to worry about on bino forums to keep you worried, forever. However, most of those worries come from optically clueless people! People who build their lives around hearsay and flawed opinions! Break away from that crowd.
An excellent, common sense/no nonsense article which can be easily proven to be true just by following it with a binocular to hand. All subscribers to the forum should read and acquaint themselves with it post haste! What was that saying about organ grinders and monkeys again? If you want to know the truth, speak to the former and not the latter!

RB
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top