• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Binocular ramblings (1 Viewer)

Tero

Retired
United States
I have pretty much what I need for routine birding, but I always shop a bit.

My local sports store had some Zeiss lower end models. Very nice, bright roof prisms. They were even on sale, but none were really set up with eye glasses. They had the rubber cups.

There were Nikon Monarchs and a few other roof prisms of that sort. I was sort of surprised the store quit carrying the Sporters. Is Nikon phasing them out? I had planned to get them in 8x36 as well, and they are available on line.

I looked at some 10x50s. I did not like the Nikon Actions, though the Action EXs would have been OK. Most 10x50 porros they had focused only to some 8-10m. I have a 8x pair of Action EXs, I like those for the wide field, and they are fairly bright.

Bushnell 10x pairs were some odd roof prism models, 10x40 and 10x27. The smaller one was almost as good as the bigger.

This was all inside the store, I was looking at shoes on a wall 100m away!

In the last week, saw the Swift Audubon porros, 8.5x44. They were beautiful, and the new model has nice eye cups. I was quite interested in them, but now I am thinking the porros are not all that rugged.

I came home mostly cured, I realize I have two fairly useable pairs, and a cheap 10x50 I sometimes use, which is much better than the lowest price Bushnell.

Your Binocular Experience this week?
 
Last edited:
If you like the Swift porros have a look at the Swift 828 HHS 8.5x44 roofs
19mm eye relief for us specs wearers, excellent dioptre adjustment, glorious view - I don't feel jealous of anyone.
 
Sure, I will. I only found one Swift roof prism model, a smaller one, so far. It was pretty good. Better than my Sporters. Will get to eagle Optics maybe in the spring, in person.
 
Sorry Tero, nothing new this week for me. I am still experimenting with the different Nikons in my stable. I am trying to find an E series model either "locally" or on the net. Haven't had much luck yet. ;)
 
Well Tero, I have something new. Like Frank, I've been experimenting with my Nikons. I have both model EII's and I've been comparing them to my old model trinovids, My Eagle 6 and 10 x 32's and my Swift 8.5 x 44 porro's. Then I got an idea to compare them with a Nikon Roof Prism, so I got myself for christmas a Nikon 8 x 32 LXL. They arrived about a week ago, in time for the bad weather here. I can't go into details at this time but I can mention that they are holding up, optically speaking, very well when compared with the 8 x 30 EII's. One thing I noticed very early is that the image given by the LXL's is noticably larger than the one given in the EII's. I believe the reason for this was discussed in another earlier forum by Henry Link, but I can't remember why it is so.

Anyway, when I have vetted them out, I'll have a report on them.

Bob
 
Last edited:
One thing I noticed very early is that the image given by the LXL's is noticably larger than the one given in the EII's.

I know it was discussed previously as well but I just wanted to say that it is very easy to notice if you have the porros and roofs side by side. I was tinkering with the SEs EIIs and LXs just this afternoon and it continues to surprise me just how noticeable that effect is. Where did you get the LXLs from ceasar?
 
FrankD said:
I know it was discussed previously as well but I just wanted to say that it is very easy to notice if you have the porros and roofs side by side. I was tinkering with the SEs EIIs and LXs just this afternoon and it continues to surprise me just how noticeable that effect is. Where did you get the LXLs from ceasar?

Eagle Optics. They are polite, patient, knowledgeable, helpful and fast.
Bob
 
Stopped by camera store
http://www.cccamera.com/products.html
thry were not too terribly pushy. Mostly Nikons and Pentax's. The ProMaster roof prisms at $200 were surprisingly good, 10x45 with a fairly wide view. It is some wstore brand for a number of camera stores. Not sure who really makes them.

One Nikon pair of Porros, 8x36 or so were $500. SOME BETTER GLASS AND COATINGS, BUT I'M NOT PAYING THAT MUCH FOR porros with rubber fold down eye cups. The Action 7X35s are almost as good in the field as far as I'm concerned. Only the 8x40 Nikon Porros I have already have impressed me so far in 8x porros of medium price up to several hundred.

The Swift Audubon 8.5x44 roofs are not at all in my town.

Nikon Roof Prism, so I got myself fo.r christmas a Nikon 8 x 32 LXL.

I did actually have some 8x36s in my hand today, possibly Pentax, that were pretty wide, much wider FOV than my Sporters. I had to pass, not really needed, I have that use covered.

Here are some of the Promasters
http://www.promaster.com/products/p...rs&Page=SubCat&CatID=60&SubCatID=1&sm=sm2_601
http://www.helixphoto.com/binoculars/promasterbino/promasterbino.htm

They are not fancy, but better than the Wal Mart Bushnells for sure, and some thought went into all the features. The glass is coated in some..maybe all.. models:
Every optical glass surface is fully broadband multicoated. This is not true of many far more expensive binoculars. The prisms are specially selected BAK-4 glass that has been silver coated for the maximum light transmission. The ocular of every model has the maximum eye relief possible. This enhances the brightness and viewing ease. In addition, they all feature twist up eyecups for maximum ease of use. Every Infinity model has been designed with an extra wide field of view so that your customers will never miss the action.
In particular, I think the Promaster 10x45 roof prisms compare favorably with Nikon Monarch and cost less. Warranty is supposed to be good.
 
Last edited:
Tero,
Nikon 8 x 36 porro's for $500.00 bucks? Are you sure they weren't 8 x 32 Superior E's? If so, you should have tried them out and seen what the view from a great binocular looks like! $500.00 is their usual list price.
Bob











Bob
 
Last edited:
Those are the one's. They have rubber eyecups which really aren't bad. I used them for 15 years on my Leica Trinovids and recently replaced them for $25.00, but those are Leica prices. I understand Nikon's replacements cost $3.00. Anyway, next time you get a chance spend a bit of time checking them out and check out their big brother, the 10 x 42 SE. They are the best porros made. Try to get outside when you vet them out instead of staying in the store.
Bob
 
So much for binocular shopping. I may have to wait a few months. Just replaced my tripod. My old one had too much play. This one is not fancy, but a step in the right direction. Should cover me for a year or two. Or five. I don't see upgrading the scope before that.
 
Last edited:
I've borrowed my wife's Minolta Compact II pocket porros, 10x25. I put them to the test looking for an eagle that has spent weeks across our big river. I found the brown blob in the tree. It took a while to convince myself it had a white head. I know the Bushnell Trophys, 8x25, I use on casual walks would not have worked.

Found another flying Bald Eagle no problem, but no white head on that.

I guess I need better compacts. The IN CAR bins I have do work, but too big to carry on nonbirding walks.
 
Tero,

Speaking of new compacts, have you been following the discussion on the Nikon Sportstars over in the main binoculars forum? Worthy of consideration especially considering the price.
 
Yes, and just as it comes up, there does not seem to be a pair in town. We have a Cabela's moving in, though. I like REI for outdoor stuff, but they have like 3 models of odd binoculars.
 
ceasar said:
...
One thing I noticed very early is that the image given by the LXL's is noticably larger than the one given in the EII's. I believe the reason for this was discussed in another earlier forum by Henry Link, but I can't remember why it is so.
Bob

Bob,

The larger apparent image of the roof LXL is due to an increased magnification without any corresponding increase in the stereo base (i.e., the distance between the objectives). The brain compensates by behaving as if you were closer to the subject. But, keep in mind that it's only a perception and has nothing to do with the ability to see detail.

Ed
 
Ok, now I don't need the compacts so bad. I guess I would like some small bright 10x pair eventually, but I seem to have two of these Minoltas. One we got from an insurance company as replacement for pocket bins stolen, along with the camera in whose bag they were. Both are 25mm porros, one is 8x and one 10x. As the 10x was not too terribly dim, I am trying them for a while. I can switch to 8x if needed. My wife uses these once in a while, but does not care which.

I got the extra pair when we went to look at eagles once and we did not all have a pair. Found them marked down to $25.

Had a chance to see the one remaining eagle on the river. Had with me 3 cheapos. Bushnell 7-15x porro zooms, used at 15x, ancient Bushnell 12x roof prisms, Minolta Compact II 10X porros. The Minoltas were the only ones that worked 500-600m away, across the river. The zooms did give me a decent view and even a tiny white head at 7x.
 
Last edited:
I've really been interested in the new Vortex/Stokes 8X42s. I've seen and handled one pair and was very impressed. Some folks are thinking it may be the best glass out there under $1,000 U.S.

Anyone have an opinion?
 
Warning! This thread is more than 12 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top