• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Possibly Booted Eagle? (1 Viewer)

I couldn't agree more. How far, I wonder, is the inclusion of cirtensis within Long-legged Buzzard more to do with our human bias towards visual details like plumage rather than considering shape, behaviour etc when assigning a bird to a particular species. Have there been any DNA studies on these birds and, if so, what does it suggest? Would putting it within Buteo buteo raise just as many questions? Is splitting it as a novel species in its own right unsupportable?

As far as I remember, one genetic studies show weak differences between cirtensis and buteo but same weak differences between rufinus and buteo... as no one want to lump them all, we have to wait for another study to offer a fair solution!
 
apart from humancentric views (we are classifying them after all) wouldnt it be helpful to examine all gradually using UV to see how THEY differentiate each other? might lead to a whole new discussion on these subspecies and hybrids and geographical variation!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top